Back

Penetration of Topically Applied Polymeric Nanoparticles across the Epidermis of Thick skin

Antony, A.; Raju, G.; Job, A.; Joshi, M.; Shankarappa, S.

2023-08-17 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.08.16.553364 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The natural barrier function of the epidermal skin layer poses a significant challenge to nanoparticle-mediated topical delivery. A key factor in this barrier function is the thickness of the stratum corneum (SC) layer within the epidermis, which varies across different anatomical sites. The epidermis from the palms and soles, for instance, have thicker SC compared to those from other areas. Previous studies have attempted to bypass the SC layer for nanoparticle penetration by using physical disruption; however, these studies have mostly focused on non-thick skin. In this study, we investigate the role of mechano-physical strategies on SC of thick skin for transdermal nanoparticle penetration. We characterize and compare two mechano-physical strategies, namely tape-stripping and microneedle abrasion, for epidermal disruption in both thick and thin skin. Furthermore, we examine the impact of SC disruption in thick and thin skin on the penetration of topically applied 100 nm sized polystyrene nanoparticles using an ex-vivo model. Our findings show that tape-stripping reduced the overall thickness of SC in thick skin by 87%, from 67.4 {+/-} 17.3 {micro}m to 8.2 {+/-} 8.5 {micro}m, whereas it reduced thin skin SC by only 38%, from 9.9 {+/-} 0.6 {micro}m to 6.2 {+/-} 3.2 {micro}m. Compared to non-thick skin, SC disruption in thick skin resulted in higher nanoparticle diffusion. Tape-stripping effectively reduces SC thickness of thick skin and can be potentially utilized for enhanced penetration of topically applied nanoparticles in skin conditions that affect thick skin.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
4
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
6
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
12
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
13
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
16
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
17
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
18
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
19
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
21
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
22
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
23
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
24
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
25
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
26
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%