Automating an insect biodiversity metric using distributed optical sensors: an evaluation across Kansas, USA cropping systems
Rydhmer, K.; Eckberg, J. O.; Lundgren, J. G.; Jansson, S.; Still, L.; Quinn, J. E.; Washington, R.; Lemmich, J.; Nikolajsen, T.; Sheller, N.; Michels, A. M.; Bredeson, M. M.; Bick, E. N.; Rosenzweig, S. T.
Show abstract
Global ecosystems and food supply depend on insect biodiversity for key functions such as pollination and decomposition. High-resolution, accurate data on invertebrate populations and communities across scales are critical for informing conservation efforts. However, conventional data collection methodologies for invertebrates are expensive, labor intensive, and require substantial taxonomic expertise, limiting researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. Novel optical techniques show promise for automating such data collection across scales as they operate unsupervised in remote areas. In this work, optical insect sensors were deployed in 20 agricultural fields in Kansas, USA. Measurements were compared to conventional assessments of insect diversity from sweep nets and Malaise traps. Species richness was estimated on optical insect data by applying a clustering algorithm to the optical insect sensors signal features of wing-beat frequency and body-to-wing ratio. Species richness correlated more strongly between the optical richness estimate and each of the conventional methods than between the two conventional methods, suggesting sensors can be a reliable indicator of invertebrate richness. Shannon- and Simpson indices were calculated for all three methods but were largely uncorrelated including between conventional methods. Although the technology is relatively new, optical sensors may provide next-generation insight into the spatiotemporal dynamics of invertebrate biodiversity and their conservation. Significance StatementThe implications of this research extend from the field level to the regional level. Much of what scientists understand about the decline of invertebrates comes from a small number of long-term studies that can be coarse and correlational in nature. High-resolution biodiversity data sets on fields to landscapes may provide the insight needed for the successful management and accounting of biodiversity by practitioners and policymakers. Such high-resolution data has the potential to support global efforts and coordination of biodiversity conservation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Insect biomass of protected habitats under the impact of arable farming in Germany 93%
- Unlocking the potential of historical abundance datasets to study biomass change in flying insects 93%
- DNA metabarcoding successfully quantifies relative abundances of arthropod taxa in songbird diets: a validation study using camera-recorded diets 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- One size does not fit all: a novel approach for determining the Realised Viewshed Size for remote camera traps 93%
- Real-time alerts from AI-enabled camera traps using the Iridium satellite network: a case-study in Gabon, Central Africa 92%
- Classifying the activity states of small vertebrates using automated VHF telemetry 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal inventorying and monitoring of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity 94%
- Insect-habitat-plant interaction networks provide guidelines to mitigate the risk of transmission of Xylella fastidiosa to grapevine in Southern France 94%
- Association between land use, land cover, plant genera, and pollinator abundance in mixed-use landscapes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Selective logging shows no impact on the dietary breadth of the fawn leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros cervinus) 92%
- Vigilance response of a key prey species to anthropogenic and natural threats in Detroit 92%
- Advancing bee conservation in the US: gaps and opportunities in data collection and reporting 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.