Back

Comparative Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of Avirulent and Virulent Strains of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. carthami: Insights into Pathogenesis and Virulence Determinants in Safflower Infections

Aabha, A.; Laxmi, V.; Singh, B.; Mehta, S.; Gupta, A. K.; Shrivastav, A.; Sawant, S.; Agarwal, S. k.; Paritosh, K.; Agarwal, M.

2023-08-15 genomics
10.1101/2023.08.14.553163 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vascular wilt disease incited by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. carthami (Foc) in Safflower poses a significant threat to its production in India. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular underpinning of compatible and incompatible interaction is of extreme economic importance. In the present study, the genome of a virulent (IARI-5175) and a avirulent (F-00845) Foc strain were sequenced and assembled using data generated from Illumina in combination with Nanopore technologies and HiC. Foc genomes were assembled into 88 and 23 scaffolds with an estimated total size of 46 Mb and 42 Mb respectively for IARI-5175 and F-00845 strains. Reference based mapping of Foc genome with F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) resulted in chromosomal level ordering of genome and simultaneous identification of accessory genome. Additionally, two lineage specific chromosomes were also identified for virulent Foc strain IARI-5175. Genomic comparisons were made on the basis of effectors, CAZymes, secondary metabolites and mycotoxins to understand the global view pathogenicity in Foc. Moreover, the transcriptome of Foc during compatible and incompatible interaction was sequenced and analyzed leading to the identification of differentially regulated genes. Taken together our study laid a solid foundation to explore novel effector genes that play a crucial role in the establishment of disease and can further be used as targets to devise new strategies to curb wilt disease in safflower.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.