LFSPROShiny: an interactive R/Shiny app for prediction and visualization of cancer risks in families with deleterious germline TP53 mutations
Nguyen, N. H.; Dodd-Eaton, E. B.; Peng, G.; Corredor, J. L.; Jiao, W.; Woodman-Ross, J.; Arun, B. K.; Wang, W.
Show abstract
PurposeLFSPRO is an R library that implements risk prediction models for Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), a genetic disorder characterized by deleterious germline mutations in the TP53 gene. To facilitate the use of these models in clinics, we developed LFSPROShiny, an interactive R/Shiny interface of LFSPRO that allows genetic counselors (GCs) to perform risk predictions without any programming components, and further visualize the risk profiles of their patients to aid the decision-making process. MethodsLFSPROShiny implements two models that have been validated on multiple LFS patient cohorts: a competing-risk model that predicts cancer-specific risks for the first primary, and a recurrent-event model that predicts the risk of a second primary tumor. Starting with a visualization template, we keep regular contact with GCs, who ran LFSPROShiny in their counseling sessions, to collect feedback and discuss potential improvement. Upon receiving the family history as input, LFSPROShiny renders the family into a pedigree, and displays the risk estimates of the family members in a tabular format. The software offers interactive overlaid side-by-side bar charts for visualization of the patients cancer risks relative to the general population. ResultsWe walk through a detailed example to illustrate how GCs can run LFSPROShiny in clinics, from data preparation to downstream analyses and interpretation of results with an emphasis on the utilities that LFSPROShiny provides to aid decision making. ConclusionSince Dec 2021, we have applied LFSPROShiny to over 100 families from counseling sessions at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Our study suggests that software tools with easy-to-use interfaces are crucial for the dissemination of risk prediction models in clinical settings, hence serving as a guideline for future development of similar models.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Integrative Analysis using the BioMedical Evidence Graph 93%
- DeepPhe-CR: Natural Language Processing Software Services for Cancer Registrar Case Abstraction 93%
- Actionability of Synthetic Data in a Heterogeneous and Rare Healthcare Demographic; Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with Cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- XPRS: A Tool for Interpretable and Explainable Polygenic Risk Score 94%
- AI-HOPE: An AI-Driven conversational agent for enhanced clinical and genomic data integration in precision medicine research 93%
- U-PASS: unified power analysis and forensics for qualitative traits in genetic association studies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The application of Large Language Models to the phenotype-based prioritization of causative genes in rare disease patients 93%
- Accurate Prediction of Breast Cancer Survival through Coherent Voting Networks with Gene Expression Profiling 92%
- Synthetic data for privacy-preserving clinical risk prediction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- MMFP-Tableau: Enabling Precision Mitochondrial Medicine through Integration, Visualization, and Analytics of Clinical and Research Health System Electronic Data 93%
- Large-Scale Deep Learning for Metastasis Detection in Pathology Reports 93%
- Trajectories: a framework for detecting temporal clinical event sequences from health data standardized to the OMOP Common Data Model 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating algorithmic fairness in the presence of clinical guidelines: the case of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk estimation 90%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 89%
- ChatGPT in glioma patient adjuvant therapy decision making: ready to assume the role of a doctor in the tumour board? 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.