Back

Development and validation of the pharmacological statin-associated muscle symptoms risk stratification (PSAMS-RS) score using real-world electronic health record data

Sun, B.; Yew, P. Y.; Chi, C.-L.; Song, M.; Loth, M.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Straka, R. J.

2023-08-15 health informatics
10.1101/2023.08.10.23293939 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionStatin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) contribute to the nonadherence to statin therapy. In a previous study, we successfully developed a pharmacological SAMS (PSAMS) phenotyping algorithm that distinguishes objective versus nocebo SAMS using structured and unstructured electronic health records (EHRs) data. Our aim in this paper was to develop a pharmacological SAMS risk stratification (PSAMS-RS) score using these same EHR data. MethodUsing our PSAMS phenotyping algorithm, SAMS cases and controls were identified using University of Minnesota (UMN) Fairview EHR data. The statin user cohort was temporally divided into derivation (1/1/2010 to 12/31/2018) and validation (1/1/2019 to 12/31/2020) cohorts. First, from a feature set of 38 variables, a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression model was fitted to identify important features for PSAMS cases and their coefficients. A PSAMS-RS score was calculated by multiplying these coefficients by 100 and then adding together for individual integer scores. The clinical utility of PSAMS-RS in stratifying PSAMS risk was assessed by comparing the hazard ratio (HR) between 4th vs 1st score quartile. ResultsPSAMS cases were identified in 1.9% (310/16128) of the derivation and 1.5% (64/4182) of the validation cohort. After fitting LASSO regression, 16 out of 38 clinical features were determined to be significant predictors for PSAMS risk. These factors are male gender, chronic pulmonary disease, neurological disease, tobacco use, renal disease, alcohol use, ACE inhibitors, polypharmacy, cerebrovascular disease, hypothyroidism, lymphoma, peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease and concurrent uses of fibrates, beta blockers or ezetimibe. After adjusting for statin intensity, patients in the PSAMS score 4th quartile had an over seven-fold (derivation) (HR, 7.1; 95% CI, 4.03-12.45) and six-fold (validation) (HR, 6.1; 95% CI, 2.15-17.45) higher hazard of developing PSAMS versus those in 1st score quartile. ConclusionThe PSAMS-RS score can be a simple tool to stratify patients risk of developing PSAMS after statin initiation which can facilitate clinician-guided preemptive measures that may prevent potential PSAMS-related statin non-adherence.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
4
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
10
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%