Back

Intrinsic Susceptibility Of The Left Vs Right Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve To Paralysis: A Systematic Review

Oswald, A.; Pitman, M. J.

2023-08-10 otolaryngology
10.1101/2023.08.09.23293889 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveUnilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) occurs more commonly on the left than right, a difference historically attributed to greater left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) length and its presence in the thorax with consequential increased exposure to injury. However, considering the importance of mRNA locally transcribed in the distal nerve after nerve injury, there may be other intrinsic neuromuscular reasons for this discrepancy. To investigate whether intrinsic neuromuscular issues influence laterality, this study investigates the rate of paralysis relative to side in idiopathic and short-term intubation cases, excluding cases due to identifiable disease and surgery. Data SourcesEmbase and PubMed database Review MethodsA systematic literature search was performed to capture articles published up until May 2022. Articles were included if laterality and etiology of paralysis were reported. Demographic data was extracted for patients diagnosed with idiopathic paralysis or paralysis after intubation for procedures performed outside the head, neck, and thorax. Study design was collected from included articles. ResultsTwenty-one studies were included, from which 702 patients were drawn for analysis. Within the idiopathic group, 69.2% were left-sided. Within the post-intubation group, 67.9% were left-sided. ConclusionsThe available evidence indicates that left-sided paralysis is more common in patients with idiopathic or short-term intubation related UVFP. This suggests intrinsic neuromuscular differences contribute to the left RLN being more susceptible than the right to damage and dysfunction. Further study is needed to identify these differences, which may provide insights into the pathophysiology of RLN paralysis as well possible therapeutic options.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.