Tail length in male versus female fox squirrels (Sciurus niger)
Nichols, H. K.; Smith, S. K.; Eddington, V. M.; Calistri-Yeh, A.; Kloepper, L. N.; Young, V. K. H.
Show abstract
BackgroundArboreal mammals rely on their tails to aid in balance while maneuvering complex habitats. Females experience additional challenges to locomotion due to reproductive demands including altered body mass and/or body shape, which leads to shifts in center of mass. Without compensation, this may increase the risk of losing balance and falling out of trees. We tested the hypothesis that female squirrels have longer tails than males to offset shifts in center of mass that may result from pregnancy. ResultsMorphological data were collected from 57 fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) in northern Indiana in summer 2019 and 2021. Although our initial t-test analysis of relative tail length (RTL) showed that female squirrels had longer tails than males (p = 0.02), a subsequent ANCOVA that controlled for effect of body length indicated no significant effect of sex on tail length (p = 0.42). ConclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate the potential impacts of different analysis methods on overall understanding of organismal functional morphology and are an important addition to the literature on tail form and function, which remains poorly understood compared to other appendages.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardization and validation of a panel of cross-species microsatellites to individually identify the Asiatic wild dog (Cuon alpinus): implications in population estimation and dynamics 92%
- Does novelty influence foraging decision of a scavenger? 91%
- Estimating body volumes and surface areas of animalsfrom cross-sections 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.