Effect of a low-intensity digital intervention on recovery from depression among older adults in Brazil: a randomised clinical trial
Scazufca, M.; Nakamura, C. A.; Seward, N.; Didone, T. V. N.; Moretti, F. A.; Pereira, L. A.; Da Costa, M. O.; De Souza, C. H. Q.; De Oliveira, G. M.; Martins, M. M. d. S.; Dos Santos, M. S.; de Ven, P. V.; Hollingworth, W.; Peters, T. J.; Araya, R.
Show abstract
Importance: There is an urgent need to provide scalable solutions to treat depression amongst older adults in poorly resourced settings. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of the Viva Vida digital psychosocial intervention for the treatment of depression among older adults. Design: Pragmatic, two-arm, individually randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Setting: Twenty-four primary care clinics in Guarulhos, Brazil. Participants: Older adults (60+ years) registered with these clinics were contacted by phone for a screening assessment provided that an active mobile number was available from their primary care records. A two-stage screening for depressive symptomatology with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) two-items followed by PHQ 9-items was applied. Those who scored [≥] 10 on the PHQ-9 were assessed at baseline and invited to participate. A total of 603 participants were recruited between September 2021 and April 2022, and followed-up to September 2022. Interventions: The Viva Vida psychosocial programme was offered to the intervention arm (n=298). Over six weeks, participants received 48 audio and visual messages based on psychoeducation and behavioural activation sent by WhatsApp. Health professionals were not involved. The control arm received a single message with information about depression (n=305). Both groups received routine primary care. Main outcomes: The primary outcome was recovery from depression (PHQ-9 score<10) at the three-month follow-up. Depression at five months was a secondary outcome. Results: Of 603 participants (mean age, 65.1 years; 451 (74.8%) women), 527 (87.4%) completed the three-month follow-up assessment. At this follow-up, 109 of 257 (42.4%) participants in the intervention arm had recovered from depression, compared with 87 of 270 (32.2%) participants in the control arm (adjusted odds ratio: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.27; P=.021). This benefit was not maintained at the five-month follow-up (adjusted odds ratio: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.47; P=.892). Conclusions and relevance: These results demonstrate the usefulness in reducing depressive symptoms using a self-help intervention that can be readily integrated into primary care programmes for treating older adults with depression. More research is needed to understand how the intervention can be optimised to maintain benefits in the longer term. Trial Registration: ReBEC registration: RBR-4c94dtn (https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-4c94dtn). Key pointsQuestion: Can a low-intensity digital (self-help) psychosocial intervention delivered by automated WhatsApp audio and visual messages over six weeks improve depression recovery among older adults in Brazil? Findings: In this randomised controlled trial involving 603 older adults with depressive symptomatology, the Viva Vida digital intervention substantially improved recovery from depression compared with enhanced usual care at three months (42.4% versus 32.2%; odds ratio: 1.56). However, this difference was not maintained at five months. Meaning: The Viva Vida programme is a simple and easily scalable strategy, that can be integrated as a first step in the treatment of older adults with depression in primary care.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A potential impact of physical distancing on physical and mental health. A rapid narrative umbrella review of meta-analyses on the link between social isolation and health 96%
- The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam COVID-19 exposure index: a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of the pandemic on daily functioning of older adults 95%
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 94%
- Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention and a health self-management programme on psychological well-being in older adults with subjective cognitive decline: Secondary analyses from the SCD-Well randomised clinical trial 94%
- Effectiveness of dyadic interventions in improving outcomes for adults with multiple long-term conditions and/or frailty and their informal carers: A systematic review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation Among Unpaid Caregivers in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Relationships to Age, Race/Ethnicity, Employment, and Caregiver Intensity 92%
- Exploring the Efficacy and Potential of Large Language Models for Depression: A Systematic Review 91%
- Conspiratorial thinking in a 50-state survey of American adults 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 95%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 93%
- The IGNITE Trial: Participant Recruitment Lessons Prior to SARS-CoV-2 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Preventing respiratory illness in older adults aged 60 years and above living in long-term care: A rapid overview of reviews 93%
- Understanding the Challenges of Medicine Optimisation Among Older People From Ethnic Minority Communities (Aged 60 Years and Above) With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Realist Review Protocol 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.