Back

Unravelling the complex biogeographic and anthropogenic history of Alaska's mountain goats

Young, K. B.; Shafer, A. B.; White, K. S.

2023-08-08 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.08.07.552341 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimWe used genetic tools to examine the population structure of mountain goats in Alaska, USA and assessed the demographic history of this species in relation to the natural and anthropogenic forces. LocationAlaska, USA TaxonNorth American mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus) MethodsSamples were collected between 2006 - 2020 from harvested animals and live captures. We genotyped 816 mountain goats at 18 microsatellite loci and identified the number of genetically distinct subpopulations across the state and assessed their genetic diversity. We used Bayesian computation software to investigate the demographic history relative to the known biogeographic history of the state. We also simulated island translocation events and compared simulations to empirical data to address the hypothesis that Baranof Island was a cryptic refugia. ResultsWe showed that Alaska has four genetically distinct subpopulations of mountain goats with some additional genetic structure within those subpopulations. The main split of mountain goats between Southcentral and Southeast Alaska occurred [~]14,000 years ago. Simulations of translocation events largely aligned with the current populations observed today except for Baranof Island which showed greater diversity than the translocation simulation. Main ConclusionsThe distribution and genetic structure of mountain goats in Alaska reflects a combination of natural and anthropogenic forces. A rapid northerly expansion through an ice-free corridor in combination with the isolated nature of the landscape led to low diversity and isolation 14,000 years ago in Southcentral Alaska and higher diversity in Southeast Alaska. Two of the three islands where mountain goat translocations have occurred match genetically with their source population, while Baranof Island appears to have a divergent population, consistent with the hypothesis of an endemic or cryptic population prior to the translocation event. This study highlights the value of considering both the natural and anthropogenic forces when assessing the biogeographic history of a species.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.3%
2
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
8
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
24
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
29
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%