Back

Simulated musculoskeletal optimization for sprinting and marathon running

Van Wouwe, T.; Hicks, J.; Delp, S.; Liu, K.

2023-08-07 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.08.07.552222 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Musculoskeletal geometry and muscle volumes vary widely in the population and are intricately linked to the performance of tasks ranging from walking and running to jumping and sprinting. However, our ability to understand how these parameters affect task performance has been limited due to the high computational cost of modelling the necessary complexity of the musculoskeletal system and solving the requisite multi-dimensional optimization problem. For example, sprinting and running are fundamental to many forms of sport, but past research on the relationships between musculoskeletal geometry, muscle volumes, and running performance has been limited to observational studies, which have not established cause-effect relationships, and simulation studies with simplified representations of musculoskeletal geometry. In this study, we developed a novel musculoskeletal simulator that is differentiable with respect to musculoskeletal geometry and muscle volumes. This simulator enabled us to find the optimal body segment dimensions and optimal distribution of added muscle volume for sprinting and marathon running. Our simulation results replicate experimental observations, such as increased muscle mass in sprinters, as well a mass in the lower end of the healthy BMI range and a higher leg-length-to-height ratio in marathon runners. The simulations also reveal new relationships, for example showing that hip musculature is vital to both sprinting and marathon running. We found hip flexor and extensor moment arms were maximized to optimize sprint and marathon running performance, and hip muscles the main target when we simulated strength training for sprinters. Our simulation results can help sprint and marathon runners customize strength training, and our simulator can be extended to other athletic tasks, such as jumping, or to non-athletic applications, such as designing interventions to improve mobility in older adults or individuals with movement disorders. AUTHOR SUMMARYOur study addresses the challenge of determining optimal musculoskeletal parameters for tasks like sprinting and marathon running. Existing research has been limited to observational studies and simplified simulations. To overcome these limitations, we developed a differentiable musculoskeletal simulator to optimize running performance. We replicated past findings and uncovered new insights. We confirmed the benefits of increased muscle mass for sprinters and identified key factors for marathon runners, such a mass in the lower end of the healthy BMI range and an increased leg-length-to-height ratio. Hip musculature was found to be critical for both sprinting and marathon running. Our simulation results have practical implications. They can inform customized strength training for sprinters and marathon runners. Additionally, the simulator can be extended to other athletic tasks, benefiting various sporting events. Beyond athletics, our open-source simulator has broader applications. It can determine minimal strength requirements for daily activities, guide strength training in the elderly, and estimate the effects of simulated musculoskeletal surgery.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
5
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
24
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%