Much more than a name change: Impact of the new steatotic liver disease nomenclature on clinical algorithms and disease classification in U.S. adults and adolescents
Ma, N.; Bansal, M.; Chu, J.; Branch, A.
Show abstract
Background and AimsThe newly proposed nomenclature for steatotic liver diseases (SLD) aims to reduce the stigma associated with "non-alcoholic fatty liver disease" (NAFLD), increase awareness, and provide a framework for delineating pathogenic pathways. Approach and ResultsWe projected the new nomenclatures diagnostic scheme onto National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data and determined SLD prevalence, fibrosis risk factors, subtypes, and consistency with previous classifications. Steatosis grade and fibrosis stage were estimated from vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE). At a threshold of 240 dB/m, 62.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 59.8-64.3%] of adults ([≥] 20 years) and 30.5% (95% CI, 27.1-34.0%) of adolescents (12-19 years) had SLD. By American Gastroenterological Association criteria, 19.3 million (95% CI, 15.8-22.8) adults with SLD qualify for hepatology referral. Over 98% of adults but only 85% of adolescents with NAFLD met criteria for definite MASLD. Significant fibrosis ([≥] 8.6 kPa) occurred in 13.5 million (95% CI, 10.9-16.2) adults with MASLD; risk factors varied by race and ethnicity. Significant fibrosis occurred in over 1.5 million adults without any identified LD and was associated with lead (Pb) exposure, odds ratio = 3.89 (95% CI, 2.00-7.56). ConclusionsThe overarching term, SLD, changes the diagnostic algorithm and creates an umbrella classification that highlights the extraordinary prevalence of liver steatosis. The more precise nomenclature establishes a valuable patient-centric platform for research and clinical care, clarifying risk groups and risk factors, including adolescents with NAFLD but without definite MASLD and adults without SLD in whom toxic exposures may increase fibrosis risk.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-retest reliability of hepatic venous pressure gradient and impact on trial design: a study in 289 patients from the control groups of 20 randomized trials 94%
- Effect of Increased Alcohol Consumption During COVID-19 Pandemic on Alcohol-related Liver Disease: A Modelling Study 93%
- Organ damage proteomic signature identifies patients with MASLD at-risk of systemic complications 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hepatic MCPIP1 protein levels are reduced in NAFLD patients and are predominantly expressed in cholangiocytes and liver endothelium 94%
- The NAD Metabolome is Functionally Depressed in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-related Liver Disease 93%
- Genome-Wide Association Study of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Identifies Association with Apolipoprotein E 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive lipidomics reveals reduced hepatic lipid turnover in NAFLD during alcohol intoxication 94%
- Identification and functional characterisation of a rare MTTP variant underlying hereditary non-alcoholic fatty liver disease 93%
- Constitutive Androstane Receptor contributes towards increased drug clearance in cholestasis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- rs641738C>T near MBOAT7 is positively associated with liver fat, ALT, and histological severity of NAFLD: a meta-analysis 94%
- Liver disease is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes - a UK Biobank study 93%
- Mendelian Randomization Analysis Dissects the Relationship between NAFLD, T2D, and Obesity and Provides Implications to Precision Medicine 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of COVID-19 patients with pre-existing cirrhosis: A multicenter cohort study 93%
- Differential Intrahepatic Integrated HBV DNA Patterns Between HBeAg-Positive and HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B 89%
- A common CTRB misfolding variant associated with pancreatic cancer risk causes ER stress and inflammation in mice 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.