Back

Much more than a name change: Impact of the new steatotic liver disease nomenclature on clinical algorithms and disease classification in U.S. adults and adolescents

Ma, N.; Bansal, M.; Chu, J.; Branch, A.

2023-08-08 gastroenterology
10.1101/2023.08.04.23293664 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsThe newly proposed nomenclature for steatotic liver diseases (SLD) aims to reduce the stigma associated with "non-alcoholic fatty liver disease" (NAFLD), increase awareness, and provide a framework for delineating pathogenic pathways. Approach and ResultsWe projected the new nomenclatures diagnostic scheme onto National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data and determined SLD prevalence, fibrosis risk factors, subtypes, and consistency with previous classifications. Steatosis grade and fibrosis stage were estimated from vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE). At a threshold of 240 dB/m, 62.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 59.8-64.3%] of adults ([≥] 20 years) and 30.5% (95% CI, 27.1-34.0%) of adolescents (12-19 years) had SLD. By American Gastroenterological Association criteria, 19.3 million (95% CI, 15.8-22.8) adults with SLD qualify for hepatology referral. Over 98% of adults but only 85% of adolescents with NAFLD met criteria for definite MASLD. Significant fibrosis ([≥] 8.6 kPa) occurred in 13.5 million (95% CI, 10.9-16.2) adults with MASLD; risk factors varied by race and ethnicity. Significant fibrosis occurred in over 1.5 million adults without any identified LD and was associated with lead (Pb) exposure, odds ratio = 3.89 (95% CI, 2.00-7.56). ConclusionsThe overarching term, SLD, changes the diagnostic algorithm and creates an umbrella classification that highlights the extraordinary prevalence of liver steatosis. The more precise nomenclature establishes a valuable patient-centric platform for research and clinical care, clarifying risk groups and risk factors, including adolescents with NAFLD but without definite MASLD and adults without SLD in whom toxic exposures may increase fibrosis risk.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
3
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
5
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
8
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
9
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
14
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
16
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
19
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Journal of Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%