Back

Ion-Concentration Gradients During Synaptic Input Increase the Voltage Depolarization in Dendritic Spines

Eberhardt, F.

2023-08-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.08.03.551788 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The cable equation is key for understanding the electrical potential along dendrites or axons, but its application to dendritic spines remains limited. Their volume is extremely small so that moderate ionic currents suffice to alter ionic concentrations. The resulting chemical-potential gradients between dendrite and spine head lead to measurable electrical currents. The cable equation, however, considers electrical currents only as result of gradients in the electrical potential. The Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) equations allow a more accurate description, as they include both types of currents. Previous PNP simulations predict a considerable change of ionic concentrations in spines during an excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP). However, solving PNP-equations is computationally expensive, limiting their applicability for complex structures. Here, we present a system of equations that generalizes the cable equation and considers both, electrical potentials and time-dependent concentrations of ion species with individual diffusion constants. Still, basic numerical algorithms can be employed to solve such systems. Based on simulations, we confirm that ion concentrations in dendritic spines are changing significantly during current injections that are comparable to synaptic events. Electrical currents reflecting ion diffusion through the spine neck increase voltage depolarizations in the spine head. Based on this effect, we identify a mechanism that affects the influx of Ca2+ in sequences of pre- and postsynaptic action potentials. Taken together, the diffusion of individual ion species need to be taken into account to accurately model electrical currents in dendritic spines. In the future the presented equations can be used to accurately integrate dendritic spines into multicompartment models to study synatptic integration.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
23.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
6
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
7
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
9
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
10
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
11
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
14
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
21
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%