Back

Assay for characterizing adsorption-properties of surfaces (APS) used for sample preparation prior to quantitative omics

Siebels, B.; Moritz, M.; Hübler, D.; Gocke, A.; Schlüter, H.; Voss, H. L.

2023-08-09 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.08.03.551632 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Analytes during their journey from their natural sources to their identification and quantification are prone to adsorption to surfaces before they enter an analytical instrument, causing false quantities. This problem is especially severe in diverse omics. Here, thousands of analytes with a broad range of chemical properties and thus different affinities to surfaces are quantified within a single analytical run. For quantifying adsorption effects caused by surfaces of sample handling tools, an assay was developed, applying LC-MS/MS-based differential bottom-up proteomics and as probe a reference mixture of thousands of tryptic peptides, covering a broad range of chemical properties. The assay was tested by investigating the adsorption properties of several vials composed of polypropylene, including low-protein-binding polypropylene vials, borosilicate glass vials and low-retention glass vials. In total 3531 different peptides were identified and quantified across all samples and therefore used as probes. A significant number of hydrophobic peptides adsorbed on polypropylene vials. In contrast, only very few peptides adsorbed to low-protein-binding polypropylene vials. The highest number of peptides adsorbed to glass vials, driven by electrostatic as well as hydrophobic interactions. Calculation of the impact of the adsorption of peptides on differential quantitative proteomics showed significant false results. In summary, the new assay is suitable to characterize adsorption properties of surfaces getting into contact with analytes during sample preparation, thereby giving the opportunity to find parameters for minimizing false quantities. Insert Table of Contents artwork here O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=106 SRC="FIGDIR/small/551632v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bafb12org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b98219org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c3b45org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1074180_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.5%
2
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.3%
3
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
5
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
7
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
8
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
11
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
12
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
14
Journal of Proteomics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
Food Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%
19
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
20
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
21
Chemical Communications
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
22
Molecular Omics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
23
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Clinical Proteomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
25
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%