Back

Neo-epitope identification by weakly-supervised peptide-TCR binding prediction

Liu, Q.; Gao, Y.; Gao, Y.; Li, W.; Wu, S.

2023-08-03 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.08.02.550128 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The identification of T cell neo-epitopes is fundamental and computational challenging in tumor immunotherapy study. As the binding of pMHC - T cell receptor (TCR) is the essential condition for neo-epitopes to trigger the cytotoxic T cell reactivity, several computational studies have been proposed to predict neo-epitopes from the perspective of pMHC-TCR binding recognition. However, they often failed with the inaccurate binding prediction for a single pMHC -TCR pair due to the highly diverse TCR space. In this study, we proposed a novel weakly-supervised learning framework, i.e., TCRBagger, to facilitate the personalized neo-epitope identification with weakly-supervised peptide-TCR binding prediction by bagging a sample-specific TCR profile. TCRBagger integrates three carefully designed learning strategies, i.e. a self-supervised learning strategy, a denoising learning strategy and a Multi-Instance Learning (MIL) strategy in the modeling of peptide-TCR binding. Our comprehensive tests revealed that TCRBagger exhibited great advances over existing tools by modeling interactions between peptide and TCR profiles. We further applied TCRBagger in different clinical settings, including (1) facilitating the peptide-TCR binding prediction under MIL using single-cell TCR-seq data. (2) improving the patient-specific neoantigen prioritization compared to the existing neoantigen identification tools. Collectively, TCRBagger provides novel perspectives and contributions for identifying neo-epitopes as well as discovering potential pMHC-TCR interactions in personalized tumor immunotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.