Back

A versatile framework for drug-target interaction prediction by considering domain specific features

Liu, S.; Yu, J.; Ni, N.; Wang, Z.; Chen, M.; Li, Y.; Xu, C.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yao, X.; Liu, H.

2023-08-17 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.08.01.551396 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Predicting drug-target interaction (DTI) is a critical and rate-limiting step in drug discovery. Traditional wet-lab experiments are reliable but expensive and time-consuming. Recently, deep learning has revealed itself as a new and promising tool for accelerating the DTI prediction process because its powerful performance. Due to the vast chemical space, the DTI prediction models are typically expected to discover drugs or targets that are absent from the training set. However, generalizing prediction performance to novel drug-target pairs that belong to different distributions is a challenge for deep learning methods. In this work, we propose an Ensemble of models that capture both Domain-generIc and domain-Specific features (E-DIS) to learn diversity domain features and adapt to out-of-distribution (OOD) data. We employed Mixture-of-Experts (MOE) as a domain-specific feature extractor for the raw data to prevent the loss of any crucial features by the encoder during the learning process. Multiple experts are trained on different domains to capture and align domain-specific information from various distributions without accessing any data from unseen domains. We evaluate our approach using four benchmark datasets under both in-domain and cross-domain settings and compare it with advanced approaches for solving OOD generalization problems. The results demonstrate that E-DIS effectively improves the robustness and generalizability of DTI prediction models by incorporating diversity domain features.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.