Hidden in plain sight: the invasive macroalga Caulerpa prolifera evades detection by environmental DNA methods due to negligible shedding
Waters, T.; Langlois, K.; Gold, Z.; Theroux, S.; Eagle, R.
Show abstract
The macroalgae Caulerpa prolifera is considered an invasive species in many environments and can colonize large patches of seafloor, reduce native species, and alter ecosystem functioning. Environmental managers need a rapid and cost-effective monitoring tool for tracking the spread of this invasive species. We developed a digital PCR assay for detection of C. prolifera from environmental DNA seawater samples. We demonstrate, in both field and laboratory experiments, that the invasive algae C. prolifera is undetectable in practical applications of eDNA due to its minimal shedding. To test why, we conducted tank-based shedding experiments for two California invasive algae species, C. prolifera and Sargassum horneri. Copy numbers of C. prolifera eDNA detected in the experimental tanks were found to be two orders of magnitude lower than S. horneri. A meta-analysis of steady state eDNA produced by aquatic organisms reported in the literature show C. prolifera to have the lowest recorded steady state concentrations of eDNA in the water column. We attribute C. prolifera low eDNA shedding to its unique biology as a unicellular, multinucleate, macroscopic siphonous algae which reduces the possible modes of eDNA release compared to multicellular organisms. Our results highlight the value of benchmarking and validating eDNA surveys in both field and laboratory settings and potential limits of eDNA approaches for some applications. These results also emphasize the importance of organismal physiology in eDNA shedding rates, variations in mechanisms of eDNA shedding between organisms, and characterizing shedding rates for accurate interpretation of eDNA results.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Water volume, biological and PCR replicates influence the characterization of deep-sea pelagic fish communities. 97%
- Targeted Next Generation Sequencing of environmental DNA improves detection and quantification of invasive European green crab (Carcinus maenas) 97%
- Leveraging eDNA metabarcoding to characterize nearshore fish communities in Southeast Alaska: Do habitat and tide matter? 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs? 95%
- Integrating environmental DNA monitoring to inform eel (Anguilla anguilla) status in freshwaters at their easternmost range - A case study in Cyprus 95%
- Considerations for metabarcoding-based port biological baseline surveys aimed at marine non-indigenous species monitoring and risk-assessments 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- eDNA metabarcoding vs metagenomics: an assessment of dietary competition in two estuarine pipefishes 94%
- Sampling Microbial Dynamics in the Salish Sea Estuary: Evaluating Methods to Capture Cyanobacteria and Cyanophage 94%
- From sea surface to seafloor: a benthic allochthonous eDNA survey for the abyssal ocean 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of activity, energy use, and species identity on environmental DNA shedding of freshwater fish 96%
- Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for Simultaneous Monitoring and Ecological Assessment of Many Harmful Algae 96%
- A multi-gene region targeted capture approach to detect plant DNA in environmental samples: A case study from coastal environments 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring 97%
- Molecular diet analysis in zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissena spp.) and an assessment of the utility of aquatic filter feeders as biological eDNA filters 96%
- Estimation of Species Abundance Based on the Number of Segregating Sites using Environmental DNA (eDNA) 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.