Back

A fearful adult attachment style is associated with double the prevalence of chronic pain compared to secure attachment: A national survey of a South African population

Stamp, G. E.; Iacovides, S.; Wadley, A. L.

2023-08-04 pain medicine
10.1101/2023.07.27.23293239
Show abstract

Our response to threats, including pain, are believed to be learnt during our early interpersonal relationships, and can be measured through attachment style. Preliminary epidemiological evidence suggests that insecure attachment styles are more prevalent in those with chronic pain. Our aim was to determine the association between adult attachment style and chronic pain prevalence and burden in a South African population. A nationwide online survey determined adult attachment style (using The Experience in Close Relationships - Relationship Structures (ECR-RS) Questionnaire), prevalence of chronic pain and typically-associated psychological factors. In those with chronic pain, the association with attachment style and pain burden (pain sites, severity and interference, using the Brief Pain Inventory) was further determined. Results of the 2371 individuals were analyzed using multivariate generalized linear models. In our young (median age 23 years; IQR 20-28), well-educated and primarily female (74%) cohort with predominantly a middle-to-high socioeconomic status, we found a high prevalence of chronic pain (27%). All three insecure attachment styles were associated with increased chronic pain prevalence when compared to the secure attachment style (Dismissing: 31%, Odds ratio [95%CI] = 1.38 [1.02-1.85], p=0.037; Preoccupied: 42%, Odds ratio [95%CI] = 2.26 [1.62-3.13], p<0.001; Fearful: 49%, Odds ratio [95%CI] = 2.95 [2.03-4.29], p<0.001). Adult attachment style was not directly associated with the burden of chronic pain, because pain catastrophizing mediated this relationship. Adult attachment style was, however, directly associated with chronic pain prevalence, with more than double the chronic pain prevalence in the fearfully, compared to securely, attached individuals.

Matching journals

1
Pain
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.2%
155× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 25%
17.0%
3
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
219× avg
4
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 9%
3.3× avg
5
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 18%
1.7× avg
6
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.6%
23× avg
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
47× avg
8
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 7%
3.2× avg
9
Social Science & Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.7%
20× avg
10
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Elsevier BV · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 10%
2.1× avg
12
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
13
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
14
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
15
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
8.1× avg
16
Blood Advances
American Society of Hematology · based on 16 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
17
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
7.7× avg