Integrating Mental Health and Psycho-Social Support (MHPSS) into infectious disease outbreak and epidemic response: an umbrella review and operational framework
Alkasaby, M.; Philip, S.; Douba, Z.; Tu, H.; Eaton, J.; Mohammed, M.; Essar, M. Y.; Kamal, M. A.; Adeel Riaz, M. M.; Moussallem, M.; Bosu, W. K.; Walker, I.
Show abstract
IntroductionInfectious disease outbreaks have a substantial impact on peoples psychosocial well-being. Yet, mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions are not systemically integrated into outbreak and epidemic response. Our review aims to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of MHPSS interventions in outbreaks and propose a framework for systematically integrating MHPSS into outbreak response. MethodsWe conducted an umbrella review in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for umbrella reviews. ResultsWe identified 23 systematic literature reviews, 6 of which involved meta-analysis, and only 30% (n=7) were of high quality. Most of the available literature was produced during COVID-19 and focused on clinical case management and medical staff well- being, with scarce evidence on the well-being of other outbreak responders and MHPSS in other outbreak response pillars. ConclusionDespite the low quality of the majority of the existing evidence, MHPSS interventions have the potential to improve the psychological well- being of those affected by and those responding to outbreaks. They also can improve the outcomes of the outbreak response activities such as contact tracing, infection prevention and control, and clinical case management. Our proposed framework would facilitate integrating MHPSS into outbreak response and hence mitigate the mental health impact of outbreaks. Review registrationPROSPERO CRD42022297138.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health services implementation in Colombia – a systematic review 94%
- Mentorship in Health Research Institutions in Africa: A Systematic Review of Approaches, Benefits, Successes, Gaps and Challenges 94%
- Suicide and self-harm in low- and middle- income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 94%
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature–based Interventions (NBIs) aimed at improving mental health and wellbeing: Protocol of an umbrella review 94%
- Individual Participant Data Network Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
- A decade of Acceptability Research with Adolescents in Africa: Systematic review and evidence map 94%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 92%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 92%
- “My friends would believe my word”: appropriateness and acceptability of respondent-driven sampling in recruiting young tertiary student men who have sex with men for HIV/STI research in Nairobi, Kenya 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Interrupting the intergenerational cycle of violence: protocol for a three-generational longitudinal mixed-methods study in South Africa (INTERRUPT_VIOLENCE) 91%
- Global Measurement of Physical Intimate Partner Violence to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 5 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.