Back

Impact of Community Masking on SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Ontario after Adjustment for Differential Testing by Age and Sex

Peng, A.; Bosco, S.; Tuite, A.; Simmons, A.; Fisman, D.

2023-07-28 public and global health
10.1101/2023.07.26.23293155
Show abstract

BackgroundUse of masks and respirators for prevention of respiratory infectious disease transmission is not new, but has proven controversial, and even politically polarizing during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In the Canadian province of Ontario, mask mandates were introduced by the 34 regional health authorities in an irregular fashion from June to September 2020, creating a quasi-experiment that can be used to evaluate impact of community mask mandates. Ontario SARS-CoV-2 case counts were strongly biased by testing focussed on long-term care facilities and healthcare workers. We developed a simple regression-based test-adjustment method that allowed us to adjust cases for undertesting by age and gender. We used this test- adjusted time series to evaluate mask mandate effectiveness. MethodsWe evaluated the effect of masking using count-based regression models that allowed adjustment for age, sex, public health region and time trends with either reported (unadjusted) cases, or testing-adjusted case counts, as dependent variables. Mask mandates were assumed to take effect in the week after their introduction. Model based estimates of effectiveness were used to estimate the fraction of SARS- CoV-2 cases, severe outcomes, and costs, averted by mask mandates. ResultsModels that used unadjusted cases as dependent variable identified protective effects of masking (effectiveness 15-42%), though effectiveness was variably statistically significant, depending on model choice. Mask effectiveness in models predicting test-adjusted case counts was substantially higher, ranging from 49% (44- 53%) to 73% (48-86%) depending on model choice. Effectiveness was greater in women than men (P = 0.016), and in urban health units as compared to rural units (P < 0.001). The prevented fraction associated with mask mandates was 46% (41-51%), averting approximately 290,000 clinical cases, averting 3008 deaths and loss of 29,038 QALY. Costs averted represented $CDN 610 million in economic wealth. ConclusionsLack of adjustment for SARS-CoV-2 undertesting in younger individuals and males generated biased estimates of infection risk and obscures the impact of public health preventive measures. After adjustment for under-testing, the effectiveness of mask mandates emerges as substantial, and robust regardless of model choice. Mask mandates saved substantial numbers of lives, and prevented economic costs, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Ontario, Canada.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 41%
12.5%
2
CMAJ Open
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
11.2%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 4%
7.5%
4
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 2%
6.4%
5
Canadian Medical Association Journal
based on 15 papers
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 16%
4.7%
7
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 4%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 8%
2.8%
9
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 31%
2.8%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
11
The Lancet Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
based on 57 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 10%
1.6%
14
Annals of Internal Medicine
based on 27 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
15
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
16
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
17
Vaccine
based on 140 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 9%
1.2%
19
Annals of Epidemiology
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 25%
0.8%
21
The Lancet Global Health
based on 24 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
23
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 15%
0.8%
24
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 10%
0.7%
27
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 87%
0.7%
28
Preventive Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
JAMA
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.7%