Back

Experimental infection of elk (Cervus canadensis) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) with SARS-CoV-2

Porter, S. M.; Hartwig, A. E.; Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H.; Root, J.; Bosco-Lauth, A.

2023-07-26 microbiology
10.1101/2023.07.25.550568 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Elk (Cervus canadensis) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) were experimentally evaluated for susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. Elk did not shed infectious virus but produced low-level serological responses. Mule deer shed and transmitted virus in addition to mounting pronounced serological responses; they could therefore play a role in the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2. Article Summary LineExperimental infection of elk (Cervus canadensis) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) with SARS-CoV-2 revealed that while elk are minimally susceptible to infection, mule deer become infected, shed infectious virus, and can infect naive contacts.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Emerging Microbes & Infections
○ 74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
Similar papers in this journal
2
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.2%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Emerging Infectious Diseases
● 105 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Journal of Virology
● 499 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.7%
Similar papers in this journal
5
mSphere
● 302 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Viruses
○ 332 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Virology
○ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
9
PLOS Pathogens
● 820 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.9%
10
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.9%
11
Pathogens
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.4%
13
Journal of General Virology
● 53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
16
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
● 339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
● 466 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Infection and Immunity
● 120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
◐ 202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
American Journal of Primatology
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
24
One Health
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Animals
○ 23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Virology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.