Back

Addressing persistent challenges in digital image analysis of cancerous tissues

Prabhakaran, S.; Yapp, C.; Baker, G. J.; Beyer, J.; Chang, Y. H.; Creason, A. L.; Krueger, R.; Muhlich, J.; Patterson, N. H.; Sidak, K.; Sudar, D.; Taylor, A. J.; Ternes, L.; Troidl, J.; Yubin, X.; Sokolov, A.; Tyson, D. R.; Participants of the Cell Imaging Hackathon 2022,

2023-07-24 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.07.21.548450 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) supports many research programs and consortia, many of which use imaging as a major modality for characterizing cancerous tissue. A trans-consortia Image Analysis Working Group (IAWG) was established in 2019 with a mission to disseminate imaging-related work and foster collaborations. In 2022, the IAWG held a virtual hackathon focused on addressing challenges of analyzing high dimensional datasets from fixed cancerous tissues. Standard image processing techniques have automated feature extraction, but the next generation of imaging data requires more advanced methods to fully utilize the available information. In this perspective, we discuss current limitations of the automated analysis of multiplexed tissue images, the first steps toward deeper understanding of these limitations, what possible solutions have been developed, any new or refined approaches that were developed during the Image Analysis Hackathon 2022, and where further effort is required. The outstanding problems addressed in the hackathon fell into three main themes: 1) challenges to cell type classification and assessment, 2) translation and visual representation of spatial aspects of high dimensional data, and 3) scaling digital image analyses to large (multi-TB) datasets. We describe the rationale for each specific challenge and the progress made toward addressing it during the hackathon. We also suggest areas that would benefit from more focus and offer insight into broader challenges that the community will need to address as new technologies are developed and integrated into the broad range of image-based modalities and analytical resources already in use within the cancer research community.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.2%
2
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
4
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
5
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
9
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
13
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
27
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%