Back

Molecular diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus infection: clinical performance of Transcription Mediated Amplification (TMA) towards conventional qPCR chemistry on whole blood samples.

Bottino, P.; Pastrone, L.; Zanotto, E.; Sidoti, F.; Costa, C.; Cavallo, R.

2023-07-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.07.19.23292864 medRxiv
Show abstract

Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection represents a life-threating pathogen for immunocompromised patients. Molecular quantitative testing on whole blood or plasma represents the gold standard for diagnosis of invasive HCMV infection and for monitoring antiviral treatment in individuals at risk of CMV disease. For these reasons, accurate standardization towards the 1st WHO International standard between different centres and diagnostic kits represent an effort for a better clinical management of CMV-positive patients. Herein, we evaluate for the first time the performance of a new TMA (Transcription Mediated Amplification) kit towards qPCR chemistry, used as routine method, on whole blood samples. 755 clinical whole blood specimens were collected and simultaneously tested with TMA and qPCR assays. Data showed 99.27% agreement for positive quantified samples and 89.39% agreement for those not detected between two tested methods. Evaluation of viraemia in positive samples highlighted a good correlation for TMA and qPCR chemistries in terms of International Units ({Delta}Log10 IU/ml: - 0.29 {+/-} 0.40). TMA assay showed a significant correlation with qPCR also in monitored patients until three months, thus allowing accurate evaluation of viraemia in transplanted patients. Moreover, preliminary data about analytical sensitivity of TMA chemistry onto DBS samples showed 86.54% correlation with whole blood specimens. Thus, TMA chemistry showed a good agreement with qPCR assay, used as current diagnostic routine, and offers important advantages: FDA and IVD approval on plasma and whole blood, automated workflow with minimal hands-on time, random access loading, thus enabling a rapid and reliable diagnostics in HCMV-infected patients.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
4
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
8
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
10
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
20
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
21
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
25
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%