Back

Two-Year Evaluation of Legionella in an Aging Residential Building: Assessment of Multiple Potable Water Remediation Approaches

Lee-Masi, M.; Coulter, C.; Chow, S. J.; Zaitchik, B.; Jacangelo, J. G.; Exum, N. G.; Schwab, K. J.

2023-07-23 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2023.07.19.23292444
Show abstract

Legionella is an opportunistic waterborne pathogen that is difficult to eradicate in colonized drinking water pipes. Legionella control is further challenged by aging water infrastructure and lack of evidence-based guidance for building treatment. This study assessed multiple premise water remediation approaches designed to reduce Legionella pneumophila (Lp) within a residential building located in an aging, urban drinking water system over a two-year period. Samples (n=745) were collected from hot and cold-water lines and quantified via most probable number culture. Building-level treatment approaches included three single heat shocks (HS), three single chemical shocks (CS), and continuous low-level chemical disinfection (CCD) in the potable water system. The building was highly colonized with Lp with 71% Lp positivity. Single HS had a statistically significant Lp reduction one day post treatment but no significant Lp reduction one, two, and four weeks post treatment. The first two CS resulted in statistically significant Lp reduction at two days and four weeks post treatment, but there was a significant Lp increase at four weeks following the third CS. CCD resulted in statistically significant Lp reduction ten weeks post treatment implementation. This demonstrates that in a building highly colonized with Lp, sustained remediation is best achieved using CCD. SYNOPSISLong-term Legionella control is difficult to maintain within aging premise plumbing. This study supports continuous low-level building treatment as an effective long-term remediation of a building highly colonized with Legionella. For Table of Contents Only O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=108 SRC="FIGDIR/small/23292444v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14d8188org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17313aborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@107188org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18dbdb4_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Health Perspectives
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 0.8%
11.2%
3
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
based on 16 papers
Top 0.1%
11.1%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 2%
7.5%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 58%
7.5%
6
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 0.8%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
ACS ES&T Water
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
6.4%
8
Journal of Hospital Infection
based on 21 papers
Top 0.5%
4.7%
9
Environmental Science & Technology
based on 16 papers
Top 0.5%
2.9%
10
Water Research
based on 26 papers
Top 0.6%
2.8%
11
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 55%
2.8%
12
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
based on 17 papers
Top 0.6%
2.4%
13
Environment International
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 20%
1.3%
16
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 18%
1.3%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 18%
1.2%
18
American Journal of Infection Control
based on 12 papers
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
20
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 50%
0.8%
21
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
based on 10 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
PNAS Nexus
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 8%
0.7%