Comparative metagenomic analysis of diarrheal and non-diarrheal gut microbiome delineating the prospective development of prognostic markers and probiotics to protect from diarrhea
De, R.; Kanungo, S.; Mukhopadhyay, A. K.; Dutta, S.
Show abstract
A cross-sectional gut microbiome analysis of 23 non-diarrheal and 5 diarrheal fecal samples was conducted by employing 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing and subsequent analysis for taxonomic profiling of OTUs and abundance interpretation of reads. Significant differences in the structural composition of the two groups were observed. In both Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum in majority of the samples. B/F ratio was consistently <1 in all diarrheal samples. Significant difference in mean B/F ratio of the two groups was found. Proteobacteria was significantly more abundant in the diarrheal group. Prevotellaceae was the most abundant family in non-diarrheal samples and was suppressed significantly in diarrheal samples. Streptococcaceae was the most abundant family in 60% diarrheal samples and where Streptococcaceae was suppressed, Bacteroideaceae and Nocardeaceae were the most abundant. In non-diarrheal samples where Streptococcaceae was almost completely suppressed Bifidobacteriaceae was the most abundant and suppressed other families significantly. A negative correlation was observed between Prevotellaceae and Bacteroideaceae in the non-diarrheal group. Prevotella copri was the most abundant species in 70% non-diarrheal samples and was significantly suppressed in diarrheal samples. Proteus mirabilis was identified in all the non-diarrheal samples while they were absent in diarrheal samples. The OTUs associated with diarrheal dysbiosis can serve as prognostic markers. This is the first report on the comparative analysis of diarrheal and non-diarrheal microbiome, to our knowledge, and distinctly addressing the gut microbiome dysbiosis from the context that can lead to the development of prognostic markers and probiotics for protecting the endemic population from diarrhea.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship between True Digestibility of dietary Phosphorus and Gastrointestinal Bacteria of Goats 96%
- Frequency of five Escherichia Coli pathotypes in Iranian adults and children with acute diarrhea 95%
- Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Membrane Vesicles (MVs) Exhibit Immunomodulatory and Bactericidal Effects Against Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhimurium 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning-based gut microbiota pattern and response to fiber as a diagnostic tool for chronic inflammatory diseases 95%
- Gut microbiota analyses of Saudi populations for type 2 diabetes-related phenotypes reveals significant association 93%
- Long-term impact of fecal transplantation in healthy volunteers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gut microbial communities associated with phenotypically divergent populations of the striped stem borer Chilo suppressalis 95%
- A glimpse of antimicrobial resistance gene diversity in kefir and yoghurt 94%
- Insights into the nutritional properties and microbiome diversity in sweet and sour yogurt manufactured in Bangladesh 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pathogenicity of urinary tract infection Escherichia coli in Caenorhabditis elegans 94%
- The Signature Microbiota Driving Rumen Function Shifts in Goat Kids Introduced Solid Diet Regimes 94%
- Comprehensive genomic analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae and its temperate N-15-like phage: From isolation to functional annotation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.