Proteasomal cleavage prediction: state-of-the-art and future directions
Ziegler, I.; Ma, B.; Bischl, B.; Dorigatti, E.; Schubert, B.
Show abstract
Epitope vaccines are a promising approach for precision treatment of pathogens, cancer, autoimmune diseases, and allergies. Effectively designing such vaccines requires accurate proteasomal cleavage prediction to ensure that the epitopes included in the vaccine trigger an immune response. The performance of proteasomal cleavage predictors has been steadily improving over the past decades owing to increasing data availability and methodological advances. In this review, we summarize the current proteasomal cleavage prediction landscape and, in light of recent progress in the field of deep learning, develop and compare a wide range of recent architectures and techniques, including long short-term memory (LSTM), transformers, and convolutional neural networks (CNN), as well as four different denoising techniques. All open-source cleavage predictors re-trained on our dataset performed within two AUC percentage points. Our comprehensive deep learning architecture benchmark improved performance by 1.7 AUC percentage points, while closed-source predictors performed considerably worse. We found that a wide range of architectures and training regimes all result in very similar performance, suggesting that the specific modeling approach employed has a limited impact on predictive performance compared to the specifics of the dataset employed. We speculate that the noise and implicit nature of data acquisition techniques used for training proteasomal cleavage prediction models and the complexity of biological processes of the antigen processing pathway are the major limiting factors. While biological complexity can be tackled by more data and, to a lesser extent, better models, noise and randomness inherently limit the maximum achievable predictive performance. All our datasets and experiments are available at https://github.com/ziegler-ingo/cleavage_benchmark.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Highly Accurate Cancer Phenotype Prediction with AKLIMATE, a Stacked Kernel Learner Integrating Multimodal Genomic Data and Pathway Knowledge 95%
- THLANet: A Deep Learning Framework for Predicting TCR-pHLA Binding in Immunotherapy Applications 94%
- PandoGen: Generating complete instances of future SARS-CoV-2 sequences using Deep Learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Generalising uncertainty improves accuracy and safety of deep learning analytics applied to oncology 95%
- ProtAlign-ARG: Antibiotic Resistance Gene Characterization Integrating Protein Language Models and Alignment-Based Scoring 94%
- A novel interpretable deep transfer learning combining diverse learnable parameters for improved T2D prediction based on single-cell gene regulatory networks 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.