Back

Prospective multicenter validation of a new laboratory workflow integrating the free light chains kappa quotient in CSF analysis-Protocol of the ORCAS study

Dressel, A.; Hannich, M. J.; Suesse, M.

2023-07-17 neurology
10.1101/2023.07.16.23292727
Show abstract

IntroductionFree light chain kappa (FLC{kappa}) are a newer sensitive biomarker to detect intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. Here we report the study protocol of the ORCAS study which will evaluate a novel laboratory work flow recently proposed including FLC{kappa} analysis simplifying cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. MethodsThe ORCAS study is a prospective multicenter diagnostic biomarker study across at least 4 study sites. The study protocol does not specify which assays should be applied in the participating laboratories to detect oligoclonal bands (OCB) or measure FLC{kappa} or Ig synthesis to represent real world data. Primary outcome parameter is the sensitivity and negative predictive value of the absence of local FLC{kappa} synthesis for the absence of intrathecal synthesis according to OCB and/or intrathecal IgG, IgA, IgM synthesis in quotient diagrams. The reference range of FLC{kappa} will be indicated by the FLC{kappa} quotient diagram. This study was designed according to the STARD criteria. PerspectiveThe establishment of a newer biomarker in routine practice is associated with significant difficulties, such as the inconsistent comparability of different measurement platforms, the establishment of suitable cut-offs or insufficient knowledge regarding sensitivity and specificity of the biomarker. If the ORCAS study objective is achieved, the use of the proposed workflow integrating FLC{kappa} analysis in routine practice in CSF diagnostics could help to better characterize the intraindividual and disease-specific intrathecal humoral immune response in a resource-efficient manner.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 35%
13.6%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 22%
7.7%
3
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
based on 26 papers
Top 0.4%
6.5%
4
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
6.0%
5
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 20%
5.4%
6
Journal of Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 1.0%
2.9%
7
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
2.9%
8
European Journal of Neurology
based on 20 papers
Top 0.6%
2.9%
9
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
based on 15 papers
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
based on 14 papers
Top 1.0%
2.4%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
2.4%
14
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 8%
1.6%
16
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
1.4%
18
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 37%
1.2%
19
Annals of Neurology
based on 43 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Neurology
based on 38 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
26
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 14%
0.8%
27
BMC Neurology
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Alzheimer's & Dementia
based on 84 papers
Top 5%
0.7%