Back

Prospective multicenter validation of a new laboratory workflow integrating the free light chains kappa quotient in CSF analysis-Protocol of the ORCAS study

Dressel, A.; Hannich, M. J.; Suesse, M.

2023-07-17 neurology
10.1101/2023.07.16.23292727 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionFree light chain kappa (FLC{kappa}) are a newer sensitive biomarker to detect intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. Here we report the study protocol of the ORCAS study which will evaluate a novel laboratory work flow recently proposed including FLC{kappa} analysis simplifying cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. MethodsThe ORCAS study is a prospective multicenter diagnostic biomarker study across at least 4 study sites. The study protocol does not specify which assays should be applied in the participating laboratories to detect oligoclonal bands (OCB) or measure FLC{kappa} or Ig synthesis to represent real world data. Primary outcome parameter is the sensitivity and negative predictive value of the absence of local FLC{kappa} synthesis for the absence of intrathecal synthesis according to OCB and/or intrathecal IgG, IgA, IgM synthesis in quotient diagrams. The reference range of FLC{kappa} will be indicated by the FLC{kappa} quotient diagram. This study was designed according to the STARD criteria. PerspectiveThe establishment of a newer biomarker in routine practice is associated with significant difficulties, such as the inconsistent comparability of different measurement platforms, the establishment of suitable cut-offs or insufficient knowledge regarding sensitivity and specificity of the biomarker. If the ORCAS study objective is achieved, the use of the proposed workflow integrating FLC{kappa} analysis in routine practice in CSF diagnostics could help to better characterize the intraindividual and disease-specific intrathecal humoral immune response in a resource-efficient manner.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
4
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
8
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
18
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
29
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%