Back

Booster dose of self-amplifying SARS-CoV-2 RNA vaccine vs. mRNA vaccine: a phase 3 comparison of ARCT-154 with Comirnaty

Oda, Y.; Kumagai, Y.; Kanai, M.; Iwama, Y.; Okura, I.; Minamida, T.; Yagi, Y.; Kurosawa, T.; Greener, B.; Zhang, Y.; Walson, J. L.

2023-07-13 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.07.13.23292597 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLicensed mRNA vaccines demonstrated initial effectiveness against COVID-19 but require booster doses to broaden the anti-SARS-CoV-2 response. There is an unmet need for novel highly immunogenic and broadly protective vaccines. We compared immunogenicity and tolerability of ARCT-154, a novel self-amplifying mRNA vaccine with the mRNA vaccine, Comirnaty(R). MethodsWe compared immune responses to ARCT-154 and Comirnaty booster doses in healthy 18- 77-year-old Japanese adults initially immunised with two doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Comirnaty or Spikevax(R)) then a third dose of Comirnaty at least 3 months previously. Neutralising antibodies were measured before and 28 days after booster vaccination. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of the immune response against Wuhan-Hu-1 SARS-CoV-2 virus as geometric mean titre (GMT) ratios and seroresponse rates (SRR) of neutralising antibodies; key secondary endpoints included the immune response against the Omicron BA.4/5 variant and vaccine tolerability assessed using participant-completed electronic diaries. FindingsBetween December 13, 2022 and February 25, 2023 we enrolled 828 participants randomised 1:1 to receive ARCT-154 (n = 420) or Comirnaty (n = 408) booster doses. Four weeks after boosting, ARCT-154 induced higher Wuhan-Hu-1 neutralising antibodies GMTs than Comirnaty (5641 [95% CI: 4321, 7363] and 3934 [2993, 5169], respectively), a GMT ratio of 1{middle dot}43 (95% CI: 1{middle dot}26-1{middle dot}63), with SRR of 65{middle dot}2% (60{middle dot}2-69{middle dot}9) and 51{middle dot}6% (46{middle dot}4-56{middle dot}8) meeting the non-inferiority criteria. Respective anti-Omicron BA.4/5 GMTs were 2551 (1687-3859) and 1958 (1281-2993), a GMT ratio of 1{middle dot}30 (95% CI: 1{middle dot}07-1{middle dot}58), with SRR of 69{middle dot}9% (65{middle dot}0-74{middle dot}4) and 58{middle dot}0% (52{middle dot}8-63{middle dot}1), meeting the superiority criteria for ARCT-154 over Comirnaty. Booster doses of either ARCT-154 or Comirnaty were equally well-tolerated with no causally-associated severe or serious adverse events; 94{middle dot}8% and 96{middle dot}8% of ARCT-154 and Comirnaty vaccinees reported local reactions and 65{middle dot}7% and 62{middle dot}5% had solicited systemic adverse events. Events were mainly mild in severity, occurring and resolving within 3-4 days of vaccination. InterpretationImmune responses four weeks after an ARCT-154 booster dose in mRNA-immunised adults were higher than after a Comirnaty booster, meeting non-inferiority criteria against the prototype Wuhan-Hu-1 virus, and superiority criteria against the Omicron BA.4/5 variant. FundingThe study was funded by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare following a public invitation to bid for an urgent improvement project for vaccine manufacturing systems, fourth invitation, Grant number: 1212-3. Clinical Trials registration and identifierThe study was registered on the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials (jRCT 2071220080).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.