Natural Language Processing Can Automate Extraction of Barrett's Esophagus Endoscopy Quality Metrics
Soroush, A.; Diamond, C. J.; Zylberberg, H. M.; May, B.; Tatonetti, N.; Abrams, J. A.; Weng, C.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo develop an automated natural language processing (NLP) method for extracting high-fidelity Barretts Esophagus (BE) endoscopic surveillance and treatment data from the electronic health record (EHR). MethodsPatients who underwent BE-related endoscopies between 2016 and 2020 at a single medical center were randomly assigned to a development or validation set. Those not aged 40 to 80 and those without confirmed BE were excluded. For each patient, free text pathology reports and structured procedure data were obtained. Gastroenterologists assigned ground truth labels. An NLP method leveraging MetaMap Lite generated endoscopy-level diagnosis and treatment data. Performance metrics were assessed for this data. The NLP methodology was then adapted to label key endoscopic eradication therapy (EET)-related endoscopy events and thereby facilitate calculation of patient-level pre-EET diagnosis, endotherapy time, and time to CE-IM. Results99 patients (377 endoscopies) and 115 patients (399 endoscopies) were included in the development and validation sets respectively. When assigning high-fidelity labels to the validation set, NLP achieved high performance (recall: 0.976, precision: 0.970, accuracy: 0.985, and F1-score: 0.972). 77 patients initiated EET and underwent 554 endoscopies. Key EET-related clinical event labels had high accuracy (EET start: 0.974, CE-D: 1.00, and CE-IM: 1.00), facilitating extraction of pre-treatment diagnosis, endotherapy time, and time to CE-IM. ConclusionsHigh-fidelity BE endoscopic surveillance and treatment data can be extracted from routine EHR data using our automated, transparent NLP method. This method produces high-level clinical datasets for clinical research and quality metric assessment. Study Highlights1) WHAT IS KNOWN: - Existing BE clinical data extraction methods are limited. 2) WHAT IS NEW HERE: - An NLP pipeline for granular BE clinical data.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 95%
- Nonendoscopic Detection Of Barrett’S Esophagus In Patients Without Gerd Symptoms 93%
- Normative values for body surface gastric mapping evaluations of gastric motility using Gastric Alimetry: spectral analysis 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Histopathologist Features Predictive of Diagnostic Concordance at Expert Level Amongst a Large International Sample of Pathologists Diagnosing Barrett′s Dysplasia Using Digital Pathology 94%
- Multi-centre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web-tool 92%
- Barrett's esophagus is the precursor of all esophageal adenocarcinomas 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning models for poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images using transfer learning 91%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 88%
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clonal transitions and phenotypic evolution in Barrett esophagus 91%
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Treatment Response using Diagnostic Histopathology 89%
- Efficacy and Safety of Tradipitant in Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.