Back

Natural Language Processing Can Automate Extraction of Barrett's Esophagus Endoscopy Quality Metrics

Soroush, A.; Diamond, C. J.; Zylberberg, H. M.; May, B.; Tatonetti, N.; Abrams, J. A.; Weng, C.

2023-07-13 gastroenterology
10.1101/2023.07.11.23292529 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo develop an automated natural language processing (NLP) method for extracting high-fidelity Barretts Esophagus (BE) endoscopic surveillance and treatment data from the electronic health record (EHR). MethodsPatients who underwent BE-related endoscopies between 2016 and 2020 at a single medical center were randomly assigned to a development or validation set. Those not aged 40 to 80 and those without confirmed BE were excluded. For each patient, free text pathology reports and structured procedure data were obtained. Gastroenterologists assigned ground truth labels. An NLP method leveraging MetaMap Lite generated endoscopy-level diagnosis and treatment data. Performance metrics were assessed for this data. The NLP methodology was then adapted to label key endoscopic eradication therapy (EET)-related endoscopy events and thereby facilitate calculation of patient-level pre-EET diagnosis, endotherapy time, and time to CE-IM. Results99 patients (377 endoscopies) and 115 patients (399 endoscopies) were included in the development and validation sets respectively. When assigning high-fidelity labels to the validation set, NLP achieved high performance (recall: 0.976, precision: 0.970, accuracy: 0.985, and F1-score: 0.972). 77 patients initiated EET and underwent 554 endoscopies. Key EET-related clinical event labels had high accuracy (EET start: 0.974, CE-D: 1.00, and CE-IM: 1.00), facilitating extraction of pre-treatment diagnosis, endotherapy time, and time to CE-IM. ConclusionsHigh-fidelity BE endoscopic surveillance and treatment data can be extracted from routine EHR data using our automated, transparent NLP method. This method produces high-level clinical datasets for clinical research and quality metric assessment. Study Highlights1) WHAT IS KNOWN: - Existing BE clinical data extraction methods are limited. 2) WHAT IS NEW HERE: - An NLP pipeline for granular BE clinical data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.