Back

Integrative reappraisal of the Amazonian nurse frog Allobates gasconi (Morales 2002) based on topotypical data, with implications for the systematics and taxonomy of a large species complex

Ferreira, A.; Ferrao, M.; Machado, A.; Magnusson, W.; Hanken, J.; Lima, A.

2023-07-11 zoology
10.1101/2023.07.10.548442 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Taxonomic uncertainty at the species level compromises our knowledge of biodiversity, conservation and systematics. The impact of such uncertainty is heightened in megadiverse regions such as Amazonia due to high levels of cryptic diversity. We used integrative taxonomy based on newly collected topotypical specimens to redescribe the Amazonian nurse frog Allobates gasconi and infer its phylogenetic relationships. This species was described in 2002 based solely on morphology, but several characters crucial for the reliable diagnosis of species in Allobates were not considered. Our results show that A. gasconi sensu stricto is not a member of the A. caeruleodactylus clade as previously claimed, but is a member of the A. trilineatus clade. Allobates gasconi is readily distinguished from congeners by a combination of morphological and bioacoustic characters; a revised diagnosis is provided. The type series of A. gasconi comprises more than one species, and we exclude a paratype from lower Jurua River. The species is restricted geographically to flooded environments in the middle and upper Jurua River in Brazil and in the Ucayali River in Peru. The initial misidentification, subsequent absence of topotypic molecular and acoustic data, and the poor preservation condition of the type series have contributed to taxonomic confusion since A. gasconi was first described. The descriptions of other species of Allobates published more than two decades ago were based mainly on gross morphology and we recommend integrative taxonomic revisions to elucidate their systematics.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
4
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
6
Zootaxa
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
22
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
25
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
30
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%