Implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and providers: a scoping review
Zhu, D. T.; Zhao, L.; Alzoubi, T.; Shenin, N.; Baskaran, T.; Tikhonov, J.; Wang, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionOn June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Courts decision in Dobbs v. Jackson overturned the right to abortion set forth by Roe v. Wade, granting states the authority to regulate access to abortion services. This has led to widespread bans, threatening patients access to, and healthcare providers abilities to provide, the full spectrum of reproductive health services. The ruling disproportionately affects marginalized groups, exacerbating existing social disparities in health and is an emerging public health crisis. MethodsWe conducted a scoping review to evaluate the impact of Dobbs on patients health outcomes and access to health services, as well as on medical trainees and healthcare providers ability to access abortion training and provide reproductive health services. The search was based on the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRSIMA-ScR) guidelines. We searched eight bibliographic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Science Direct, JSTOR, and Web of Science) and three preprint servers (medRxiv, bioRxiv, and Europe PMC) using various combinations of keywords related to abortion and Dobbs v. Jackson on March 22, 2023. Four reviewers independently screened the studies based on pre-specified eligibility criteria and one reviewer performed data extraction for pre-identified themes. ResultsA total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. We found that Dobbs led to a surge in demand for contraception, compounded existing travel- and cost-related barriers to access, increased polarizing views on social media (e.g., Twitter), and evoked significant fears and concerns among medical trainees regarding their scope of practice and fears of legal repercussions for offering standard-of-care and related services to patients seeking abortions. ConclusionOur study offers valuable insights into the clinical implications of Dobbs on patients health outcomes and access to health services, as well as providers reproductive health practices.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 95%
- Should COVID-specific arrangements for abortion continue? The views of women experiencing abortion in Britain during the pandemic 94%
- Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain; cross sectional survey data from the SACHA study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 95%
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 95%
- Positive deviance for promoting dual-method contraceptive use among women in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 93%
- Couple-Centered HIV Prevention and Care: Endorsement, Practice and Uncertainty among US Healthcare Providers in Western-Central Upstate New York 93%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 93%
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 91%
- Reduction in Spontaneous and Iatrogenic Preterm Births in Twin Pregnancies During COVID-19 Lockdown in Melbourne, Australia: A Multicenter Cohort Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Regional Variation in Antenatal Late Preterm Steroid Use following the ALPS Trial 93%
- COVID-19 outcomes, risk factors and associations by race: a comprehensive analysis using electronic health records data in Michigan Medicine 90%
- Disparities in COVID-19 Reported Incidence, Knowledge, and Behavior 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.