An Exploratory Study of the Association Between Preoperative Pain Catastrophizing Scale Scores and Postoperative Pain Experience in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Gill, C. J.; Giuliano,, K.
Show abstract
IntroductionOpiate misuse is increasingly common and can result from a single opiate exposure. High pain catastrophizing scores have been linked with greater reported pain and increased opiate use in outpatient studies, but this association has not previously been established in a perioperative setting. MethodsA quantitative, cross-sectional pilot study was conducted on 21 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty surgery. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) scores and patients ASA Physical Status classifications were collected prior to surgery. Postoperative pain scores were measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and postoperative opiate consumption was measured using modified morphine equivalents (MMEs). Data were analyzed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. ResultsSignificant correlations were found between NRS pain scores at 6 hours post-surgery and 48 hours post-surgery (.455); and NRS pain scores at 6 hours post-surgery and opiate consumption within the first 24 hours post-surgery (.591). A significant correlation was also found between ASA Physical Status classification and total opiate consumption (.522). While rumination scores within the Pain Catastrophizing Scale were also moderately positively correlated with reported pain scores 12 hours post-surgery (.41) and morphine dosing at 48 hours (.40), they were not significant. ConclusionsEarly preemptive pain management is an important component of overall postoperative pain management and to reduce opiate use. Results support that the ASA Physical Status classification scores may be helpful in identifying patients at risk for high opiate use. For the PCS, more data are needed to determine the clinical usefulness of the PCS as an adjunct to overall postoperative pain management.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- S-ketamine in patient-controlled analgesia with oxycodone improves analgesia in a dose-dependent manner after major lumbar fusion surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 96%
- Pain Expectations, Experiences and Coping Strategies Used By Post-operative Patients: A Descriptive Phenomelogical Study 95%
- Gender differences in PTSD severity and pain outcomes: baseline results from the LAMP trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 94%
- Guided relaxation-based virtual reality versus distraction-based virtual reality or passive control for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (FOREVR Peds trial) 93%
- Acute Pain Pathways: protocol for a prospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensory profiling in classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a case-control study revealing pain characteristics, somatosensory changes, and impaired pain modulation 93%
- Management of Central Post-Stroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 93%
- Real Bodies Not Required? Placebo Analgesia and Pain Perception in Immersive Virtual and Augmented Reality 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.