Back

In vitro formation and extended culture of highly metabolically active and contractile tissues

Bagdasarian, I. A.; Tonmoy, T. I.; Park, B. H.; Morgan, J. T.

2023-07-09 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.07.07.548141 bioRxiv
Show abstract

3D cell culture models have gained popularity in recent years as an alternative to animal and 2D cell culture models for pharmaceutical testing and disease modeling. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is a cost-effective and accessible molding material for 3D cultures; however, routine PDMS molding may not be appropriate for extended culture of contractile and metabolically active tissues. Failures can include loss of culture adhesion to the PDMS mold and limited culture surfaces for nutrient and waste diffusion. In this study, we evaluated PDMS molding materials and surface treatments for highly contractile and metabolically active 3D cell cultures. PDMS functionalized with polydopamine allowed for extended culture duration (14.8 {+/-} 3.97 days) when compared to polyethylamine/glutaraldehyde functionalization (6.94 {+/-} 2.74 days); Additionally, porous PDMS extended culture duration (16.7 {+/-} 3.51 days) compared to smooth PDMS (6.33 {+/-} 2.05 days) after treatment with TGF-{beta}2 to increase culture contraction. Porous PDMS additionally allowed for large (13 mm tall x 8 mm diameter) constructs to be fed by diffusion through the mold, resulting in increased cell density (0.0210 {+/-} 0.0049 mean nuclear fraction) compared to controls (0.0045 {+/-} 0.0016 mean nuclear fraction). As a practical demonstration of the flexibility of porous PDMS, we engineered a vascular bioartificial muscle model (VBAM) and demonstrated extended culture of VBAMs anchored with porous PDMS posts. Using this model, we assessed the effect of feeding frequency on VBAM cellularity. Feeding 3x/week significantly increased nuclear fraction at multiple tissue depths relative to 2x/day. VBAM maturation was similarly improved in 3x/week feeding as measured by nuclear alignment (23.49{degrees} {+/-} 3.644) and nuclear aspect ratio (2.274 {+/-} 0.0643) relative to 2x/day (35.93{degrees} {+/-} 2.942) and (1.371 {+/-} 0.1127), respectively. The described techniques are designed to be simple and easy to implement with minimal training or expense, improving access to dense and/or metabolically active 3D cell culture models.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
6
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
9
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
14
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
17
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
19
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
20
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
21
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%