Towards Medical Billing Automation: NLP for Outpatient Clinician Note Classification
Crowson, M. G.; Alsentzer, E.; Fiskio, J. M.; Bates, D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesOur primary objective was to develop a natural language processing approach that accurately predicts outpatient Evaluation and Management (E/M) level of service (LoS) codes using clinicians notes from a health system electronic health record. A secondary objective was to investigate the impact of clinic note de-identification on document classification performance. MethodsWe used retrospective outpatient office clinic notes from four medical and surgical specialties. Classification models were fine-tuned on the clinic notes datasets and stratified by subspecialty. The success criteria for the classification tasks were the classification accuracy and F1-scores on internal test data. For the secondary objective, the dataset was de-identified using Named Entity Recognition (NER) to remove protected health information (PHI), and models were retrained. ResultsThe models demonstrated similar predictive performance across different specialties, except for internal medicine, which had the lowest classification accuracy across all model architectures. The models trained on the entire note corpus achieved an E/M LoS CPT code classification accuracy of 74.8% (CI 95: 74.1-75.6). However, the de-identified note corpus showed a markedly lower classification accuracy of 48.2% (CI 95: 47.7-48.6) compared to the model trained on the identified notes. ConclusionThe study demonstrates the potential of NLP-based document classifiers to accurately predict E/M LoS CPT codes using clinical notes from various medical and procedural specialties. The models performance suggests that the classification tasks complexity merits further investigation. The de-identification experiment demonstrated that de-identification may negatively impact classifier performance. Further research is needed to validate the performance of our NLP classifiers in different healthcare settings and patient populations and to investigate the potential implications of de-identification on model performance.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of unstructured text in prognostic clinical prediction models: a systematic review 95%
- Development and Validation of Phenotype Classifiers across Multiple Sites in the Observational Health Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) Network 95%
- Empowering Personalized Pharmacogenomics with Generative AI Solutions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Symptom Lexicon Using Electronic Health Record Clinical Notes 96%
- Developing A Deep Learning Natural Language Processing Algorithm For Automated Reporting Of Adverse Drug Reactions 95%
- A Deep Learning Approach for Transgender and Gender Diverse Patient Identification in Electronic Health Records 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 94%
- Enhancing Research Data Infrastructure to Address the Opioid Epidemic: The Opioid Overdose Network (02-Net) 93%
- Modeling physician variability to prioritize relevant medical record information 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Learning Method to Detect Opioid Prescription and Opioid Use Disorder from Electronic Health Records 94%
- Synthetic Data Generation in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of reviews on domains, motivations, and future applications 92%
- Development and Evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic Health Records 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.