Back

Overcoming PARP inhibitor resistance by inducing a homologous recombination repair defective phenotype with ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors

Smith, H. L.; Willmore, E.; Prendergast, L.; Curtin, N. J.

2023-07-05 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.07.05.547758 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePARP inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in homologous recombination repair (HRR) defective (HRD) cancers. To (re)sensitise HRR proficient (HRP) tumours to PARPi combinations with other drugs are being explored. Our aim was to determine the mechanism underpinning the sensitisation to PARPi by inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinase ATR, CHK1 and WEE1. Experimental designA panel of HRD and HRP cells (including matched BRCA1 or 2 mutant and corrected pairs) and ovarian cancer ascites cells were used. Rucaparib (PARPi) induced replication stress (RS) and HRR (immunofluorescence microscopy for {gamma}H2AX and RAD51 foci, respectively), cell cycle changes (flow cytometry), activation of ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 (Western Blot for pCHK1S345, pCHK1S296 and pCDK1Y15, respectively) and cytotoxicity (colony formation assay) was determined, followed by investigations of the impact on all of these parameters by inhibitors of ATR (VE-821, 1 M), CHK1 (PF-477736, 50 nM) and WEE1 (MK-1775, 100 nM). ResultsRucaparib induced RS (3 to10-fold), S-phase accumulation (2-fold) and ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 activation (up to 3-fold), and VE-821, PF-477736 and MK-1775 inhibited their targets and abrogated these rucaparib-induced cell cycle changes in HRP and HRD cells. Rucaparib activated HRR in HRP cells only and was (60-1,000x) more cytotoxic to HRD cells. VE-821, PF-477736 and MK-1775 blocked HRR and sensitised HRP but not HRD cells and primary ovarian ascites to rucaparib. ConclusionsOur data indicate that, rather than acting via abrogation of cell cycle checkpoints, ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors cause an HRD phenotype and hence synthetic lethality with PARPi.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.5%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.6%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
6
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
7
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
8
Cell Cycle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
10
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
12
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
13
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
14
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
15
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
16
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
19
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
21
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
23
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%