The NYCKidSeq randomized controlled trial: Impact of GUIA digitally enhanced genetic counseling in racially and ethnically diverse families
Suckiel, S. A.; Kelly, N. R.; Odgis, J. A.; Gallagher, K. M.; Sebastin, M.; Bonini, K. E.; Marathe, P. N.; Brown, K.; Di Biase, M.; Ramos, M.; Rodriguez, J. E.; Scarimbolo, L.; Insel, B. J.; Ferar, K. D. M.; Zinberg, R. E.; Diaz, G. A.; Greally, J. M.; Abul-Husn, N. S.; Bauman, L. J.; Gelb, B. D.; Horowitz, C. R.; Wasserstein, M. P.; Kenny, E. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundDigital solutions are needed to support rapid increases in the application of genetic and genomic tests (GT) in diverse clinical settings and patient populations. We developed GUIA, a bi-lingual web-based platform that facilitates disclosure of GT results. The NYCKidSeq randomized controlled trial evaluated GUIAs impact on understanding of GT results. MethodsNYCKidSeq enrolled diverse children with neurologic, cardiac, and immunologic conditions who underwent GT. Families were randomized to genetic counseling with GUIA (intervention) or standard of care (SOC) genetic counseling for results disclosure. Parents/legal guardians (participants) completed surveys at baseline, post-results disclosure, and 6-months later. Survey measures assessed the primary study outcomes of perceived understanding of and confidence in explaining their childs GT results and the secondary outcome of objective understanding. We used regression models to evaluate the association between the intervention and the study outcomes. ResultsThe analysis included 551 participants, 270 in the GUIA arm and 281 in SOC. Participants mean age was 41.1 years and 88.6% were mothers. Most participants were Hispanic/Latino(a) (46.3%), White/European American (24.5%), or Black/African American (15.8%). Participants in the GUIA arm had significantly higher perceived understanding post-results (OR=2.8, CI[1.004,7.617], P=0.049) and maintained higher objective understanding over time (OR=1.1, CI[1.004, 1.127], P=0.038) compared to those in the SOC arm. There was no impact on perceived confidence. Hispanic/Latino(a) individuals in the GUIA arm maintained higher perceived understanding (OR=3.9, CI[1.6, 9.3], P=0.003), confidence (OR=2.7, CI[1.021, 7.277], P=0.046), and objective understanding (OR=1.1, CI[1.009, 1.212], P=0.032) compared to SOC. ConclusionsThis trial demonstrates that GUIA positively impacts understanding of GT results in diverse parents of children with suspected genetic conditions. These findings build a case for utilizing GUIA to deliver complex and often ambiguous genetic results. Continued development and evaluation of digital applications in diverse populations are critical for equitably scaling GT offerings in specialty clinics.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 94%
- A Systematic Review of the Methodological Quality of Economic Evaluations in Genetic Screening and Testing for Monogenic Disorders 92%
- Using Coincidence Analysis to Identify Causal Chains of Factors Associated with Implementation and Optimization of Lynch Syndrome Tumor Screening Across Multiple Health care Systems 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Guided Precision Medicine Clinical Decision Support Tools: A Systematic Review 92%
- Large Language Models Facilitate the Generation of Electronic Health Record Phenotyping Algorithms 92%
- Measuring Quality-of-Care in Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Novel Application of Natural Language Processing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pooled Electronic Consultation Program to Improve Access to Genetics Specialists 93%
- Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counselling 92%
- Genetic Diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1 Using Rare Variant Linkage Analysis and Long Read Genome Sequencing 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 94%
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 93%
- Benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: results of a national physician survey 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.