Back

Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the biobehavioral survey among incarcerated individuals and correctional personnel in Mozambique, 2021

Botao, C.; Mutola, A.; Nuvunga, S.; Banze, A.; Muleia, R. J.; Boothe, M.; Baltazar, C. S.

2023-07-06 public and global health
10.1101/2023.07.04.23292209 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mozambique implemented in 2021 a formative assessment in 22 prisons to identify the operational and logistical needs for the second round of the Biobehavioral Survey (BBS). We discussed barriers and facilitators that could be anticipated in conducting BBS in prisons, in preparation for implementation, structured interviews with key informants with directors and other staff were administered. The data were cleaned and analyzed in Microsoft Excel, and the categorical variables were summarized by means of simple frequencies and percentages. In most prisons the actual prison capacity far exceeds the theoretical capacity, 40.9% have a theoretical capacity of [≥] 50 inmates, 81.8% have inmates who exceed their theoretical capacity. In the country half of the prisons receive only male inmates, and only one female, 54.5% of the prisons visited have inmates under 18 years of age, 72.7% of the prisons had a private space available for the survey, the penitentiary establishments have the physical space for study; ensuring the safety of staff within the facilities; involvement of correctional officers and a clinical focal point. However, barriers such as time management due to prison opening hours, prison laws, restrictions, or permits for research may change without notice due to security, lockdowns, riots, or other situations that may hinder the implementation of research. Currently, little is known about the implementation of a BBS in a correctional environment and only a few barriers can be anticipated, for Mozambiques context, these challenges and obstacles can be overcome through clear communication and collaboration with officials at all levels.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.5%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
15.0%
3
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.5%
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
8
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
11
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
13
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
25
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%