Back

Covalent macrocyclic proteasome inhibitors mitigate resistance in Plasmodium falciparum

Bennett, J. M.; Ward, K. E.; Muir, R.; Kabeche, S.; Yoo, E.; Yeo, T.; Lam, G.; Berger, G.; Faucher, F. F.; Lin, G.; Gerwick, W. H.; Yeh, E.; Fidock, D. A.; Bogyo, M.

2023-07-03 microbiology
10.1101/2023.07.03.547579 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Plasmodium proteasome is a promising antimalarial drug target due to its essential role in all parasite lifecycle stages. Furthermore, proteasome inhibitors have synergistic effects when combined with current first-line artemisinins. Linear peptides that covalently inhibit the proteasome are effective at killing parasites and have a low propensity for inducing resistance. However, these scaffolds generally suffer from poor pharmacokinetics and bioavailability. Here we describe the development of covalent, irreversible macrocyclic inhibitors of the P. falciparum proteasome. We identified compounds with excellent potency and low cytotoxicity, however, the first generation suffered from poor microsomal stability. Further optimization of an existing macrocyclic scaffold resulted in an irreversible covalent inhibitor carrying a vinyl sulfone electrophile that retained high potency, low cytotoxicity, and had acceptable metabolic stability. Importantly, unlike the parent reversible inhibitor that selected for multiple mutations in the proteasome, with one resulting in a 5,000-fold loss of potency, the irreversible analog only showed a 5-fold loss in potency for any single point mutation. Furthermore, an epoxyketone analog of the same scaffold retained potency against a panel of known proteasome mutants. These results confirm that macrocycles are optimal scaffolds to target the malarial proteasome and that the use of a covalent electrophile can greatly reduce the ability of the parasite to generate drug resistance mutations.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.