Early oral switch in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection
Kaasch, A. J.; Lopez-Cortes, L. E.; Rodriguez-Bano, J.; Cisneros, J. M.; Navarro, D.; Faetkenheuer, G.; Jung, N.; Rieg, S.; Lepeule, R.; Coutte, L.; Bernard, L.; Lemaignen, A.; Koesters, K.; MacKenzie, C. R.; Soriano, A.; Hagel, S.; Fantin, B.; Lafaurie, M.; Talarmin, J.-P.; Dinh, A.; Guimard, T.; Boutoille, D.; Welte, T.; Reuter, S.; Kluytmans, J.; Martin, M. L.; Forestier, E.; Stocker, H.; Vitrat, V.; Tattevin, P.; Rommerskirchen, A.; Noret, M.; Adams, A.; Kern, W. V.; Hellmich, M.; Seifert, H.; SABATO group,
10.1101/2023.07.03.23291932 medRxivShow abstract
BackgroundStaphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) is treated with at least 14 days of intravenously administered antimicrobials. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an early oral switch therapy in patients at low risk for SAB-related complications. MethodsIn an international non-inferiority trial, we randomized patients with SAB after 5 to 7 days of intravenous antimicrobial therapy to either switch to an oral antimicrobial or to continue with intravenous standard therapy. Main exclusion criteria were signs and symptoms of complicated SAB, non-removable foreign devices, and severe comorbidity. Composite primary endpoint was the occurrence of any SAB-related complication (relapsing SAB, deep-seated infection, and mortality attributable to SAB) within 90 days. Results213 patients were randomized into the intention-to-treat population. In the oral switch group, 14/108 (13%) participants reached the primary endpoint versus 13/105 (12%) in the standard therapy group (adjusted difference 0.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.8% to 9.1%). Participants in the oral switch group were discharged earlier (median hospital stay from SAB onset of 12 days versus 16 days; adjusted difference -3.1 days [95% CI -7.5 to 1.4]). There was no statistical difference in 30-day survival and complications of intravenous administration. More participants in the oral group experienced at least one serious adverse event (34% versus 26%, p=0.292). ConclusionOral switch was non-inferior to intravenous standard therapy in participants with low-risk SAB. However, a careful assessment of patients for signs and symptoms of complicated SAB at time of presentation and thereafter is necessary before considering early oral switch therapy. The trial was registered as NCT01792804 in ClinicalTrials.gov, as DRKS00004741 in the German Clinical trials register, and as EudraCT 2013-000577-77.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Antiviral drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 - the DisCoVeRy trial 95%
- A placebo-controlled double blind trial of hydroxychloroquine in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 94%
- An open-label randomized, controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 – Final results from the DisCoVeRy trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sarilumab in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 94%
- Efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: the phase 2b part of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 study 93%
- Safety and Efficacy of Pemivibart, a Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibody, for Prevention of Symptomatic COVID-19: Interim Results From the CANOPY Clinical Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibiotic Review Kit for Hospitals (ARK-Hospital): a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
- Temporal changes in SARS-CoV-2 clearance kinetics and the optimal design of antiviral pharmacodynamic studies: an individual patient data meta-analysis of a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform study (PLATCOV) 91%
- Outpatient treatment of Covid-19 with metformin, ivermectin, and fluvoxamine and the development of Long Covid over 10-month follow-up. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Viral clearance as a surrogate of clinical efficacy for COVID-19 therapies in outpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Protection of prior natural infection compared to mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 in Qatar 91%
- Artemether-lumefantrine with or without single-dose primaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with or without single-dose tafenoquine to reduce Plasmodium falciparum transmission: a phase 2 single-blind randomised clinical trial in Ouelessebougou, Mali 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibiotics and hospital-associated Clostridioides difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis 2020 update 93%
- Mortality risks associated with empirical antibiotic activity in E. coli bacteraemia: an analysis of electronic health records 93%
- Estimating the cost of antibiotic use on future collateral resistance: a retrospective comparison of cefuroxime versus cefazolin and amoxicillin/clavulanate 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.