Assessing Radiotherapy Responses in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Longitudinal Analysis of T2 Relaxation Times
Hanzlikova, P.; Vilimek, D.; Vilimkova Kahankova, R.; Ladrova, M.; Skopelidou, V.; Ruzickova, Z.; Martinek, R.; Cvek, J.
Show abstract
Rationale and ObjectivesTo evaluate short and long-term changes in T2 relaxation as a response to radiotherapy in patients with low and intermediate risk localized prostate cancer. Materials and MethodsA total of 24 patients were selected for this retrospective study. Each participant underwent 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging on seven separate occasions: initially after the implantation of gold fiducials, the required step for Cyberknife therapy guidance, followed by MRI scans two weeks post-therapy and monthly thereafter. As part of each MRI scan, the prostate region was manually delineated, and the T2 relaxation times were calculated for quantitative analysis. The T2 relaxation times between individual follow-ups were analyzed using Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance. ResultsRepeated Measures Analysis of Variance (RM-ANOVA) revealed a significant difference across all measurements (F (6, 120) = 0.611, p << 0.001). A Bonferroni post hoc test revealed significant differences in median T2 values between the baseline and subsequent measurements, particularly between pre-therapy (M0) and two weeks post-therapy (M1), as well as during the monthly interval checks (M2 - M6). Some cases showed a delayed decrease in relaxation times, indicating the prolonged effects of therapy. ConclusionThe changes in T2 values during the course of radiotherapy can help in monitoring radiotherapy response in unconfirmed patients, quantifying the scarring process, and recognizing the therapy failure.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive factors for the development of peritumoral brain edema after LINAC-based radiation treatment in patients with intracranial meningioma 94%
- National diagnostic reference levels for digital diagnostic and screening mammography in Uganda. 93%
- Manganese-enhanced MRI (MEMRI) in breast and prostate cancers: exploring the potential role of calcium receptors. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Inter-observer Delineation Performance of MR-guided Delineation of Oropharyngeal Gross Tumor Volumes and High-risk Clinical Target Therapy: An R-IDEAL Stage 0 Prospective Study 96%
- Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost 95%
- Use of focal radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer and perceived barriers toward its implementation: a survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- PathProfiler: Automated Quality Assessment of Retrospective Histopathology Whole-Slide Image Cohorts by Artificial Intelligence, A Case Study for Prostate Cancer Research 91%
- Loss of HOXB13 expression in neuroendocrine prostate cancer 91%
- Association of Graph-based Spatial Features with Overall Survival Status of Glioblastoma Patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Morphological changes after cranial fractionated photon radiotherapy: localized loss of white matter and grey matter volume with increasing dose 93%
- Re-irradiation to the Prostate using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after initial definitive Radiotherapy – A systematic review and Meta-analysis of recent trials 93%
- Development of a High-Performance Multiparametric MRI Oropharyngeal Primary Tumor Auto-Segmentation Deep Learning Model and Investigation of Input Channel Effects: Results from a Prospective Imaging Registry 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Radiomic-Based Approaches in the Multi-metastatic Setting: A Quantitative Review 91%
- Updated Results of 3,050 Non-melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) Lesions in 1725 Patients Treated with High Resolution Dermal Ultrasound-Guided Superficial Radiotherapy, A Multi-institutional Study 91%
- Inference of core needle biopsy whole slide images requiring definitive therapy for prostate cancer 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.