Back

P-PPI: accurate prediction of peroxisomal protein-protein interactions (P-PPI) using deep learning-based protein sequence embeddings

Anteghini, M.; Martins dos Santos, V. A. P.; Saccenti, E.

2023-07-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.06.30.547177 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are crucial for various biological processes, and their prediction is typically accomplished through experimental methods, which can be time-consuming and costly. Computational methods provide a faster and more cost-effective approach, leveraging protein sequences and other data sources to infer PPIs. Deep learning (DL) approaches have shown promising results in various protein-related tasks, including PPI prediction. However, DL-based embeddings are often not thoroughly compared or evaluated against state-of-the-art tools. Additionally, existing PPI predictors incorporate different types of information beyond protein sequence representation, making it important to assess the effectiveness of DL-based embeddings solely relying on protein sequences. In this work, we benchmark and compare commonly used DL-based embeddings for PPI prediction based solely on protein sequence information. We utilize high-quality training data, including experimentally validated negative interactions from the Negatome database. The best model, obtained through double cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization, is selected and evaluated to predict peroxisomal PPIs. The resulting tool, P-PPI, is further enhanced by combining AlphaFold2-Multimer predictions with the P-PPI model, leveraging DL-based embeddings and protein structure predictions for a comprehensive analysis of peroxisomal PPIs. This integrated approach holds significant potential to advance our understanding of complex protein networks and their functions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.