Expert-level pediatric brain tumor segmentation in a limited data scenario with stepwise transfer learning
Boyd, A.; Ye, Z.; Prabhu, S.; Tjong, M.; Zha, Y.; Vajapeyam, S.; Hayat, H.; Chopra, R.; Liu, K.; Nabavizadeh, A.; Resnick, A.; Mueller, S.; Haas-Kogan, D.; Aerts, H.; Poussaint, T.; Kann, B.
Show abstract
PurposeArtificial intelligence (AI)-automated tumor delineation for pediatric gliomas would enable real-time volumetric evaluation to support diagnosis, treatment response assessment, and clinical decision-making. Auto-segmentation algorithms for pediatric tumors are rare, due to limited data availability, and algorithms have yet to demonstrate clinical translation. MethodsWe leveraged two datasets from a national brain tumor consortium (n=184) and a pediatric cancer center (n=100) to develop, externally validate, and clinically benchmark deep learning neural networks for pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) segmentation using a novel in-domain, stepwise transfer learning approach. The best model [via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)] was externally validated and subject to randomized, blinded evaluation by three expert clinicians wherein clinicians assessed clinical acceptability of expert- and AI-generated segmentations via 10-point Likert scales and Turing tests. ResultsThe best AI model utilized in-domain, stepwise transfer learning (median DSC: 0.877 [IQR 0.715-0.914]) versus baseline model (median DSC 0.812 [IQR 0.559-0.888]; p<0.05). On external testing (n=60), the AI model yielded accuracy comparable to inter-expert agreement (median DSC: 0.834 [IQR 0.726-0.901] vs. 0.861 [IQR 0.795-0.905], p=0.13). On clinical benchmarking (n=100 scans, 300 segmentations from 3 experts), the experts rated the AI model higher on average compared to other experts (median Likert rating: 9 [IQR 7-9]) vs. 7 [IQR 7-9], p<0.05 for each). Additionally, the AI segmentations had significantly higher (p<0.05) overall acceptability compared to experts on average (80.2% vs. 65.4%). Experts correctly predicted the origins of AI segmentations in an average of 26.0% of cases. ConclusionsStepwise transfer learning enabled expert-level, automated pediatric brain tumor auto-segmentation and volumetric measurement with a high level of clinical acceptability. This approach may enable development and translation of AI imaging segmentation algorithms in limited data scenarios. SummaryAuthors proposed and utilized a novel stepwise transfer learning approach to develop and externally validate a deep learning auto-segmentation model for pediatric low-grade glioma whose performance and clinical acceptability were on par with pediatric neuroradiologists and radiation oncologists. Key PointsO_LIThere are limited imaging data available to train deep learning tumor segmentation for pediatric brain tumors, and adult-centric models generalize poorly in the pediatric setting. C_LIO_LIStepwise transfer learning demonstrated gains in deep learning segmentation performance (Dice score: 0.877 [IQR 0.715-0.914]) compared to other methodologies and yielded segmentation accuracy comparable to human experts on external validation. C_LIO_LIOn blinded clinical acceptability testing, the model received higher average Likert score rating and clinical acceptability compared to other experts (Transfer-Encoder model vs. average expert: 80.2% vs. 65.4%) C_LIO_LITuring tests showed uniformly low ability of experts ability to correctly identify the origins of Transfer-Encoder model segmentations as AI-generated versus human-generated (mean accuracy: 26%). C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study 98%
- A Novel Fully Automated MRI-Based Deep Learning Method For Classification Of 1p/19q Co-Deletion Status In Brain Gliomas 97%
- Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using MRI radiomics and machine learning 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Brain MRI Protocols: Performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B 95%
- Impact of Non-Contrast Enhanced Imaging Input Sequences on the Generation of Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Scans using Neural Networks 92%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 97%
- Generating synthetic data in digital pathology through diffusion models: a multifaceted approach to evaluation 94%
- Predicting Prognosis and IDH Mutation Status for Patients with Lower-Grade Gliomas Using Whole Slide Images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Powered Segmentation and Prognosis with Missing MRI in Pediatric Brain Tumors 96%
- Integration of MRI radiomics and germline genetics to predict the IDH mutation status of gliomas 93%
- First-in-human prospective trial of sonobiopsy in glioblastoma patients using neuronavigation-guided focused ultrasound 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Image-localized Biopsy Mapping of Brain Tumor Heterogeneity: A Single-Center Study Protocol 95%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 93%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.