Community Antibiotic Prescribing in Patients with COVID-19 Across Three Pandemic Waves: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Ciaccio, L.; Donnan, P. T.; Parcell, B. J.; Marwick, C. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundReported changes in antibiotic prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic have focused on hospital prescribing or community population trends. Community antibiotic prescribing for individuals with COVID-19 are less well described. MethodsData covering a complete geographic population ([~]800,000) were utilised. SARS-CoV-2 virus test results from February 1, 2020-March 31, 2022 were included. Anonymised data were linked to prescription data +/-28 days of the test, GP data for high-risk comorbidities, and demographic data. Multivariate binary logistic regression examined associations between patient factors and the odds of antibiotic prescription. ResultsData included 768,206 tests for 184,954 individuals, identifying 16,240 COVID-19 episodes involving 16,025 individuals. There were 3,263 antibiotic prescriptions +/-28 days for 2,385 patients. 35.6% of patients had a prescription only before the test date, 52.5% of patients after, and 11.9% before and after. Antibiotic prescribing reduced over time: 20.4% of episodes in wave one, 17.7% in wave two, and 12.0% in wave three. In multivariate logistic regression, being female (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.19,1.45), older (OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.50, 3.68 75+ vs <25 years), having a high-risk comorbidity (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.31, 1.61), a hospital admission +/-28 days of an episode (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.42, 1.77), and health board region (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03, 1.25, board B versus A) increased the odds of receiving an antibiotic. ConclusionCommunity antibiotic prescriptions in COVID-19 episodes were uncommon in this population and likelihood was associated with patient factors. The reduction over pandemic waves may represent increased knowledge regarding COVID-19 treatment and/or evolving symptomatology.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 94%
- Criteria to Achieve Safe Antimicrobial Intravenous-to-Oral Switch in Hospitalised Adult Populations: A Systematic Rapid Review 93%
- Perceptions, views and practices regarding antibiotic prescribing and stewardship among hospital physicians in Jakarta, Indonesia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 94%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 92%
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in fluoroquinolone prescribing in UK primary and secondary care between 2019 and 2023 96%
- General practice antibiotic prescriptions attributable to Respiratory Syncytial Virus by age and antibiotic class: An ecological analysis of the English population 94%
- Antibiotics and hospital-associated Clostridioides difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis 2020 update 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic performance of the combined nasal and throat swab in patients admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19 91%
- Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients Presumed to be Treated with Sotrovimab in NHS Hospitals in England 91%
- Association between SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Select Symptoms and Conditions 31 to 150 Days After Testing among Children and Adults 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community-associated Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Case Investigations in New York City 90%
- Quantifying and adjusting for confounding from health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in observational research 89%
- Sex and gender differences in COVID testing, hospital admission, presentation, and drivers of severe outcomes in the DC/Maryland region 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.