Automated Detection of Maternal Vascular Malperfusion Lesions of the Placenta using Machine Learning
Patnaik, P.; Khodee, A.; Vasam, G.; Mukherjee, A.; Salsabili, S.; Ukwatta, E.; Grynspan, D.; Chan, A. D. C.; Bainbridge, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionHypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) are common obstetrical complications, often with pathological features of maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) in the placenta. Currently, clinical placental pathology methods involve a manual visual examination of histology sections, a practice that can be resource-intensive and demonstrate moderate-to-poor inter-pathologist agreement on diagnostic outcomes, dependant on the degree of pathologist sub-specialty training. MethodsThis study aims to apply machine learning (ML) feature extraction methods to classify digital images of placental histopathology specimens, collected from cases of HDP [gestational hypertension (GH), preeclampsia (PE), PE + FGR], normotensive FGR, and healthy pregnancies, according to the presence or absence of MVM lesions. 159 digital images were captured from histological placental specimens, manually scored for MVM lesions (MVM- or MVM+) and used to develop a support vector machine (SVM) classifier model, using features extracted from pretrained ResNet18. The model was trained with and without data augmentation, and with and without data shuffling, and the performance of the classifiers assessed and compared through measurements of accuracy, precision, and recall using confusion matrices. ResultsThe SVM model demonstrated accuracies between 7-78% for WSI-level MVM classification, with poorest performance observed on images with borderline MVM presence, as determined through post hoc observation. ConclusionThe results are promising for the integration of ML methods into the placental histopathological examination process. Using this study as a proof-of-concept will lead our group and others to carry ML models further in placental histopathology.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal ultrasonic dimensions and parametric solid models of the gravid uterus and cervix 94%
- Unique transcriptomic landscapes identified in idiopathic spontaneous and infection related preterm births compared to normal term births 93%
- Placental vascular remodeling in pregnant women with COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating clinical factors and parity-specific models with molecular biomarkers to better predict the risk of preterm birth in asymptomatic women 93%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 92%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducible And Clinically Translatable Deep Neural Networks For Cervical Screening 92%
- VISTA: Virtual ImmunoSTAining for pancreatic disease quantification in murine cohorts 92%
- Widely accessible prognostication using medical history for fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age in nationwide insured women 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Deep Learning-Derived Histologic Features of Placental Chorionic Villi with Maternal and Infant Characteristics in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection disrupts syncytial and endothelial integrity and alters PLGF levels in the placenta 93%
- Evaluation of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in utero: nine pregnant women and their newborns 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.