Back

Artificial neural network predicts sex differences of patients with advanced Parkinsons disease under Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal gel

BOUGEA, A.; Derikvand, T.; Efthymiopoulou, E.; Angelopoulou, E.

2023-06-29 neurology
10.1101/2023.06.26.23291833 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveAlthough Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment has shown to be efficacious in motor and some non-motor symptoms (NMS), not all the patients with advanced Parkinsons disease (PD) are ideal candidates. To improve their selection analysis knowledge of prognostic factors is of great importance. We aimed to develop a novel machine learning model to predict the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced PD at 2 years under the LCIG therapy. MethodsThis was a longitudinal 24-month, observational study of 59 patients with advanced PD of a Greek multicenter registry under LCIG treatment from September 2019 to September 2021. Motor status was assessed with the Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III (off) and IV. NMS were assessed by the NMS Questionnaire (NMSQ) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the quality of life by PDQ-39 and severity by Hoehn &Yahr (HY). Multivariate linear regression, ARIMA, SARIMA, and Long Short-Term Memory-recurrent neural network (LSTM-RNN) models were used. ResultsDyskinesia duration and quality of life were significantly improved with LCIG (19% and 10% greater improvement for men than women, respectively). Multivariate linear regression models showed that UPDRS-III was decreased by 1.5 and 4.39 units per one unit of increase of the PDQ-39, UPDRS-IV indexes, respectively. Among all the time series models, the LSTM-RNN model predicts these clinical characteristics with highest accuracy (mean square error =0.0069) ConclusionsThe LSTM-RNN model predicts with highest accuracy sex dependent clinical outcomes of patients with advanced PD after two years of LCIG therapy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
3
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
4
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
5
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
European Journal of Pharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
30
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%