Back

Automated Approach to Selecting Neurological Medical Imaging Orders Using Natural Language Processing

Mehta, V.; Dharia, R. T.

2023-06-27 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2023.06.24.23291863 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo develop an algorithm for automated medical imaging order selection based on provider-input signs and symptoms using natural language processing and machine learning. The aim is to reduce the frequency of inappropriate physician imaging orders, which currently accounts for 25.7% of cases, and thereby mitigate potential patient health concerns. Materials and MethodsThe study was conducted retrospectively with a four-step analysis process. The data used for training in the study consisted of anonymized imaging records and associated provider-input symptoms for CT and MRI orders in 40,667 patients from a tertiary childrens hospital. First, the data were normalized using keyword filtering and lemmatization. Second, an entity-embedding ML model converted the symptoms to high-dimensional numerical vectors suitable for model comprehension, which we used to balance the dataset through k-nearest-neighbor-based synthetic sampling. Third, a Support Vector Classifier (ML model) was trained and hyperparameter-tuned using the embedded symptoms to predict modality (CT/MRI), contrast (with/without), and anatomical region (head, neck, etc.) for the imaging orders. Finally, a web application was developed to package the model, which analyzes user-input symptoms and outputs the predicted order. ResultsThe model was found to have a final overall accuracy of 93.2% on a 4,704-case test set (p < 0.001). The AUCs for the eight classes ranged from 96% to 100%, and the average F1-score was 0.92. ConclusionThis algorithm looks to act as a clinical decision support tool to help augment the present physician imaging order selection accuracy and improve patient health.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.