Back

Fidelity and adherence to a liquefied petroleum gas stove and fuel intervention: the multi-country Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial

Williams, K. N.; Quinn, A. K.; North, H.; Wang, J.; Pillarisetti, A.; Thompson, L. M.; Diaz-Artiga, A.; Balakrishnan, K.; Thangavel, G.; Rosa, G.; Ndagijimana, F.; Underhill, L. J.; Kirby, M. A.; Puzzolo, E.; Hossen, S.; Waller, L. A.; Peel, J. L.; Rosenthal, J. P.; Clasen, T. F.; Harvey, S. A.; Checkley, W.; HAPIN Investigators,

2023-06-27 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2023.06.20.23291670
Show abstract

ABSTRACTO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSReducing household air pollution (HAP) to levels associated with health benefits requires nearly exclusive use of clean cooking fuels and abandonment of traditional biomass fuels. MethodsThe Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial randomized 3,195 pregnant women in Guatemala, India, Peru, and Rwanda to receive a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stove intervention (n=1,590), with controls expected to continue cooking with biomass fuels (n=1,605). We assessed fidelity to intervention implementation and participant adherence to the intervention starting in pregnancy through the infants first birthday using fuel delivery and repair records, surveys, observations, and temperature-logging stove use monitors (SUMs). ResultsFidelity and adherence to the HAPIN intervention were high. Median time required to refill LPG cylinders was 1 day (interquartile range 0-2). Although 26% (n=410) of intervention participants reported running out of LPG at some point, the number of times was low (median: 1 day [Q1, Q3: 1, 2]) and mostly limited to the first four months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most repairs were completed on the same day as problems were reported. Traditional stove use was observed in only 3% of observation visits, and 89% of these observations were followed up with behavioral reinforcement. According to SUMs data, intervention households used their traditional stove a median of 0.4% of all monitored days, and 81% used the traditional stove <1 day per month. Traditional stove use was slightly higher post-COVID-19 (detected on a median [Q1, Q3] of 0.0% [0.0%, 3.4%] of days) than pre-COVID-19 (0.0% [0.0%, 1.6%] of days). There was no significant difference in intervention adherence pre- and post-birth. ConclusionFree stoves and an unlimited supply of LPG fuel delivered to participating homes combined with timely repairs, behavioral messaging, and comprehensive stove use monitoring contributed to high intervention fidelity and near-exclusive LPG use within the HAPIN trial.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 3%
15.4%
2
Environmental Health Perspectives
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 54%
8.3%
4
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 0.6%
7.6%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 2%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 3%
5.3%
7
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
based on 32 papers
Top 0.7%
4.5%
8
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 43%
4.5%
9
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 24%
4.5%
10
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 8%
2.8%
11
Environment International
based on 22 papers
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 4%
1.9%
13
Environmental Science & Technology
based on 16 papers
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 0.5%
1.6%
15
Systematic Reviews
based on 11 papers
Top 0.8%
1.6%
16
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Public Health in Practice
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
Archives of Public Health
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
19
JMIR Research Protocols
based on 18 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Journal of Hospital Infection
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 8%
0.7%