Managing the Infodemic: Leveraging Deep Learning to Evaluate the Maturity Level of AI-Based COVID-19 Publications for Knowledge Surveillance and Decision Support
Awasthi, R.; Nagori, A.; Mishra, s.; Mathur, A.; Mathur, P.; Nasri, B.
Show abstract
COVID-19 pandemic has taught us many lessons, including the need to manage the exponential growth of knowledge, fast-paced development or modification of existing AI models, limited opportunities to conduct extensive validation studies, the need to understand bias and mitigate it, and lastly, implementation challenges related to AI in healthcare. While the nature of the dynamic pandemic, resource limitations, and evolving pathogens were key to some of the failures of AI to help manage the disease, the infodemic during the pandemic could be a key opportunity that we could manage better. We share our research related to the use of deep learning methods to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate AI-based COVID-19 publications which provides a unique approach to identify "mature" publications using a validated model and how that can be leveraged further by focused human-in-loop analysis. The study utilized research articles in English that were human-based, extracted from PubMed spanning the years 2020 to 2022. The findings highlight notable patterns in publication maturity over the years, with consistent and significant contributions from China and the United States. The analysis also emphasizes the prevalence of image datasets and variations in employed AI model types. To manage an infodemic during a pandemic, we provide a specific knowledge surveillance method to identify key scientific publications in near real-time. We hope this will enable data-driven and evidence-based decisions that clinicians, data scientists, researchers, policymakers, and public health officials need to make with time sensitivity while keeping humans in the loop.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the EMPIRE Index: A novel, value-based metric framework to measure the impact of medical publications 94%
- Mapping the coevolution, leadership and financing of research on viral vectors, RNAi, CRSPR/Cas9 and other genomic editing technologies 94%
- Investigating the Nature of Open Science Practices Across Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An Audit 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 92%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 92%
- Enrichment analysis on regulatory subspaces: a novel direction for the superior description of cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fear of Infection and Sufficient Vaccine Reservation Information Might Drive Rapid Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in Japan: Evidence from Twitter Analysis 93%
- Users’ Reactions on Announced Vaccines against COVID-19 Before Marketing in France: Analysis of Twitter posts 93%
- Health Communication Through News Media During the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: A Digital Topic Modeling Approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Medical Final Examination 94%
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 93%
- Comparing protein-protein interaction networks of SARS-CoV-2 and (H1N1) influenza using topological features 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.