Back

Genetic drift vs natural selection affecting the evolution of spectral and functional traits of two key macrophytes: Phragmites australis and Nuphar lutea

Castellani, M. B.; Dalla Vecchia, A.; Bolpagni, R.; Natale, R.; Piaser, E.; Lastrucci, L.; Coppi, A.; Villa, P.

2023-06-21 ecology
10.1101/2023.06.19.545543 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Both genetic and phenotypic intraspecific diversity play a crucial role in the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of organisms. Several studies have compared phenotypic divergence (Pst) and differentiation of neutral loci (Fst) to infer the relative roles of genetic drift and natural selection in population differentiation (Pst - Fst comparison). For the first time, we assessed and compared the genetic variation and differentiation at the leaf trait level in two key macrophytes, Phragmites australis and Nuphar lutea. To this aim, we quantified and described the genetic structure and phenotypic diversity of both species in five lake systems in north-central Italy. We then investigated the relative roles of genetic drift and natural selection on leaf trait differentiation (Pst - Fst), assuming that Fst reflects divergence caused only by genetic drift while Pst also incorporates the effects of selective dynamics on the phenotype. In terms of genetic structure, the results for P. australis were in line with those observed for other Italian and European conspecific populations. Conversely, N. lutea showed a more complex genetic structure than expected at the site level, likely due to the combined effect of genetic isolation and its mixed mating system. Both species exhibited high variability in leaf functional traits within and among sites, highlighting a high degree of phenotypic plasticity. Pst - Fst comparisons showed a general tendency towards directional selection in P. australis and a more complex pattern in N. lutea. Indeed, the drivers of phenotypic differentiation in N. lutea showed a variable mix of stabilizing and directional selection or neutral divergence at most sites. The prevalence of vegetative over generative reproduction leads P. australis populations to be dominated by a few clones that are well adapted to local conditions, including phenotypes that respond plastically to the environment. In contrast, in N. lutea the interaction of a mixed mating system and geographical isolation among distant sites tends to reduce the effect of outbreeding depression and provides the genetic basis for adaptive capacity. The first joint analysis of the genetic structure of these two key macrophytes allowed a better understanding of the relative roles of genetic drift and natural selection in the diversification of phenotypic traits within habitats dominated by P. australis and N. lutea.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.9%
2
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
3
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
5
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
11
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
28
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%