Back

Diagnostic Accuracy and Risk Stratification of a Trauma Risk Assessment Tool Among those with Fall Injuries

Adeyemi, O. J.; Konda, S.; DiMaggio, C.; Grudzen, C.; Pfaff, A.; Esper, G.; Arcila-Mesa, M.; Cuthel, A.; Poracky, H.; Meyman, P.; Wittman, I.; Chodosh, J.

2023-06-20 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2023.06.19.23291576 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimThe Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) is an injury risk-triage tool. This study aims to validate the STTGMAs accuracy in predicting fall-related mortality among geriatric trauma patients. MethodsUsing a retrospective cohort design, we selected 5,791 geriatric trauma patients (aged 55 years and older) from a single institutional trauma database (2017-2021). The outcome variable was fatal fall injury, measured as a binary variable. The predictor variable was the STTGMA score, measured as a continuous variable and a four-level categorical variable. We report the predictive accuracy (95% confidence interval (CI)) of the STTGMA. We further assessed the relationship between the STTGMA risk categories and hospital length of stay and time-to-death by performing multivariable quantile regression and time-varying Cox proportional hazard analyses, respectively. ResultsA total of 122 patients (2.1%) died during admission and the median hospital length of stay was 2 days. STTGMA exhibited 84% (95% CI: 75.6 - 92.0) accuracy in predicting in-hospital fall-related mortality. Compared to the minimal risk category, geriatric trauma patients classified as low, moderate, and high risks each had significantly longer hospital stays and adjusted mortality risks, in a dose-response pattern. ConclusionSTTGMA can accurately predict in-hospital mortality and risk-stratify the length of stay and the time to death among geriatric patients with fall injuries.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.