Timing and Predictors of Loss of Infectivity among Healthcare Workers with Primary and Recurrent COVID-19: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Dzieciolowska, S.; Charest, H.; Roy, T.; Fafard, J.; Carazo, S.; Levade, I.; Longtin, J.; Parkes, L.; Beaulac, S. N.; Villeneuve, J.; Savard, P.; Corbeil, J.; De Serres, G.; Longtin, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere is a need to understand the duration of infectivity of primary and recurrent COVID-19 and identify predictors of loss of infectivity. MethodsProspective observational cohort study with serial viral culture, rapid antigen detection test (RADT) and RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal specimens of healthcare workers with COVID-19. The primary outcome was viral culture positivity as indicative of infectivity. Predictors of loss of infectivity were determined using multivariate regression model. The performance of the US CDC criteria (fever resolution, symptom improvement and negative RADT) to predict loss of infectivity was also investigated. Results121 participants (91 female [79.3%]; average age, 40 years) were enrolled. Most (n=107, 88.4%) had received [≥]3 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses, and 20 (16.5%) had COVID-19 previously. Viral culture positivity decreased from 71.9% (87/121) on day 5 of infection to 18.2% (22/121) on day 10. Participants with recurrent COVID-19 had a lower likelihood of infectivity than those with primary COVID-19 at each follow-up (day 5 OR, 0.14; p<0.001]; day 7 OR, 0.04; p=0.003]) and were all non-infective by day 10 (p=0.02). Independent predictors of infectivity included prior COVID-19 (adjusted OR [aOR] on day 5, 0.005; p=0.003), a RT-PCR Ct value <23 (aOR on day 5, 22.75; p<0.001), but not symptom improvement or RADT result. The CDC criteria would identify 36% (24/67) of all non-infectious individuals on Day 7. However, 17% (5/29) of those meeting all the criteria had a positive viral culture. ConclusionsInfectivity of recurrent COVID-19 is shorter than primary infections. Loss of infectivity algorithms could be optimized.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- When should healthcare workers with COVID-19 return to work? An analysis of follow-up antigen test results after a positive COVID test 96%
- Prevalence and factors associated with antigen test positivity following SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in Los Angeles 96%
- Clinical symptoms among ambulatory patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antigen-based testing but not real-time PCR correlates with SARS-CoV-2 virus culture 94%
- Viral dynamics of Omicron and Delta SARS-CoV-2 variants with implications for timing of release from isolation: a longitudinal cohort study 93%
- Population-based estimates of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) prevalence and characteristics: A cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-occupational and occupational factors associated with specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Hospital Workers – a multicentre cross-sectional study 94%
- SARS-CoV-2 Exposures of Healthcare Workers from Primary Care, Long-Term Care Facilities and Hospitals: A Nationwide Matched Case-Control Study 93%
- Cumulative seroprevalence among healthcare workers after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in El Salvador, Central America 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low prevalence of COVID-19 Exposure is Coincident with Self-reported Compliance with Public Health Guidelines among Essential Employees at an Institute of Higher Education 93%
- Adequacy of serial self-performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen-detection testing for longitudinal mass screening in the workplace 93%
- Trajectory of viral load in a prospective population-based cohort with incident SARS-CoV-2 G614 infection 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.